Solving Decision Theory Problems with Probabilistic Answer Set Programming

Abstract Solving a decision theory problem usually involves finding the actions, among a set of possible ones, which optimize the expected reward, while possibly accounting for the uncertainty of the environment. In this paper, we introduce the possibility to encode decision theory problems with Probabilistic Answer Set Programming under the credal semantics via decision atoms and utility attributes. To solve the task, we propose an algorithm based on three layers of Algebraic Model Counting, that we test on several synthetic datasets against an algorithm that adopts answer set enumeration. Empirical results show that our algorithm can manage non-trivial instances of programs in a reasonable amount of time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068424000474
Primary Topic
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Solving Decision Theory Problems with Probabilistic Answer Set Programming

Damiano Azzolini, Rafael Kiesel, Elena Bellodi, Fabrizio Riguzzi
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
article

Solving Decision Theory Problems with Probabilistic Answer Set Programming

Damiano Azzolini, Rafael Kiesel, Elena Bellodi, Fabrizio Riguzzi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Solving a decision theory problem usually involves finding the actions, among a set of possible ones, which optimize the expected reward, while possibly accounting for the uncertainty of the environment. In this paper, we introduce the possibility to encode decision theory problems with Probabilistic Answer Set Programming under the credal semantics via decision atoms and utility attributes. To solve the task, we propose an algorithm based on three layers of Algebraic Model Counting, that we test on several synthetic datasets against an algorithm that adopts answer set enumeration. Empirical results show that our algorithm can manage non-trivial instances of programs in a reasonable amount of time.

Theory and Practice of Logic ProgrammingVol. 25(1)
TU Wien (AT), University of Ferrara (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Solving Decision Theory Problems with Probabilistic Answer Set Programming — Damiano Azzolini, Rafael Kiesel, et al. · Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS