Normative Realignment in Domestic Trade Barriers Procedures: Driving Unilateralism in the EU, US, and China

Abstract This article critically examines the evolution and potential of domestic trade barrier procedures in the US, EU, and China. Emblematic of this mechanism is US Section 301. Aimed at facilitating market access, these procedures function as tools of unilateralism and strategic leverage. Employing qualitative and comparative methods, the analysis explores their use in handling private complaints and combating adverse trade practices, highlighting a trend of ‘normative realignment’ in the deployment of these procedures. Once focused on resolving private grievances, such procedures are now increasingly playing a role in securing national interests. This shift marks a departure from traditional international cooperation, reflecting a recalibration of trade policies. Against the backgroup of growing encystment of unilateralism, the article argues that domestic trade barrier procedures could be adapted to address the demands of the current global economic environment. The article posits that, if executed properly, domestic trade barrier procedures may serve as a buffer mechanism vis-a-vis the tectonic shifts in economic order. In doing so, the article envisions a new generation of domestic trade barrier procedural frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Trade Review
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474745624000491
Citations
2
Primary Topic
World Trade Organization Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Normative Realignment in Domestic Trade Barriers Procedures: Driving Unilateralism in the EU, US, and China

Xueji Su, Julien Chaisse
2 citations
World Trade Review
World Trade Organization Law
17.04
article

Normative Realignment in Domestic Trade Barriers Procedures: Driving Unilateralism in the EU, US, and China

Xueji Su, Julien Chaisse
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article critically examines the evolution and potential of domestic trade barrier procedures in the US, EU, and China. Emblematic of this mechanism is US Section 301. Aimed at facilitating market access, these procedures function as tools of unilateralism and strategic leverage. Employing qualitative and comparative methods, the analysis explores their use in handling private complaints and combating adverse trade practices, highlighting a trend of ‘normative realignment’ in the deployment of these procedures. Once focused on resolving private grievances, such procedures are now increasingly playing a role in securing national interests. This shift marks a departure from traditional international cooperation, reflecting a recalibration of trade policies. Against the backgroup of growing encystment of unilateralism, the article argues that domestic trade barrier procedures could be adapted to address the demands of the current global economic environment. The article posits that, if executed properly, domestic trade barrier procedures may serve as a buffer mechanism vis-a-vis the tectonic shifts in economic order. In doing so, the article envisions a new generation of domestic trade barrier procedural frameworks.

World Trade ReviewVol. 24(3)
City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Harvard University, David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
World Trade Organization Law
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.