Elite Fractures, Public Capture: The Strategic Use of Public Consultation in Global Constitution-Making

Abstract Since 1974, two out of every five constitutions (40.3%) were prepared via processes that included public consultation. The reasons for adopting these participatory mechanisms, however, are largely unexplored. I argue that public consultation is a tool for elite contestation of power. Introducing an original dataset of public consultations in constitution-making processes from 1974–2021 (n = 300), I find that in democracies, factional majorities and newcomer elites use public consultation to legitimate a break from the status quo. In autocracies, governing coalitions that depend on performance and enjoy greater party institutionalization push for public consultation to preserve favorable power-sharing arrangements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law and Courts
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2024.9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elite Fractures, Public Capture: The Strategic Use of Public Consultation in Global Constitution-Making

Matthew Martin
1 citations
Journal of Law and Courts
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
15.98
article

Elite Fractures, Public Capture: The Strategic Use of Public Consultation in Global Constitution-Making

Matthew Martin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Since 1974, two out of every five constitutions (40.3%) were prepared via processes that included public consultation. The reasons for adopting these participatory mechanisms, however, are largely unexplored. I argue that public consultation is a tool for elite contestation of power. Introducing an original dataset of public consultations in constitution-making processes from 1974–2021 (n = 300), I find that in democracies, factional majorities and newcomer elites use public consultation to legitimate a break from the status quo. In autocracies, governing coalitions that depend on performance and enjoy greater party institutionalization push for public consultation to preserve favorable power-sharing arrangements.

Journal of Law and CourtsVol. 13(1)
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
15.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.