Evaluating the Potential of Microdroplet Flow in Two-Phase Biocatalysis: A Systematic Study

Two-phase biocatalysis in batch reactions often suffers from inefficient mass transfer, inconsistent reaction conditions, and enzyme inactivation issues. Microfluidics offer uniform and controlled environments ensuring better reproducibility and enable efficient, parallel processing of many small-scale reactions, making biocatalysis more scalable. In particular, the use of microfluidic droplets can increase the interfacial area between the two phases and can therefore also increase reaction rates. For these reasons, slug flow has been extensively used in two-phase biocatalysis in recent years. However, microdroplet flow has been largely neglected for this application despite its great potential. In this work, we performed biphasic biocatalysis in microfluidic droplets, both in microdroplets and slugs, as well as in batch, and systematically investigated the effect of various reaction parameters on the outcome of the reaction. We show that microdroplet flow outperforms the more commonly used batch and slug flow configurations for most reaction conditions by providing shorter substrate diffusion paths and larger interfacial area for the reaction. The potential trade-off between maximized mass transfer and possibly higher enzyme inactivation rates in small droplets with large surface-to-volume ratios was also investigated for the first time, and a pipeline was established to allow evaluation in other reactions. Finally, the effect of surfactant necessary for microdroplet stabilization was also investigated in all reaction setups for the first time, and it was shown that a properly selected surfactant can have a positive effect at low concentrations by creating more stable emulsions and smaller droplets, thus increasing the interfacial area between the two phases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c15647
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Potential of Microdroplet Flow in Two-Phase Biocatalysis: A Systematic Study

Jennifer Solarczek, Lanting Xiang, Anett Schallmey, Iordania Constantinou et al.
4 citations
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
2.70
article

Evaluating the Potential of Microdroplet Flow in Two-Phase Biocatalysis: A Systematic Study

Jennifer Solarczek, Lanting Xiang, Anett Schallmey, Iordania Constantinou, Victor Krajka, Hui Liu, Lina Ahlborn
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Two-phase biocatalysis in batch reactions often suffers from inefficient mass transfer, inconsistent reaction conditions, and enzyme inactivation issues. Microfluidics offer uniform and controlled environments ensuring better reproducibility and enable efficient, parallel processing of many small-scale reactions, making biocatalysis more scalable. In particular, the use of microfluidic droplets can increase the interfacial area between the two phases and can therefore also increase reaction rates. For these reasons, slug flow has been extensively used in two-phase biocatalysis in recent years. However, microdroplet flow has been largely neglected for this application despite its great potential. In this work, we performed biphasic biocatalysis in microfluidic droplets, both in microdroplets and slugs, as well as in batch, and systematically investigated the effect of various reaction parameters on the outcome of the reaction. We show that microdroplet flow outperforms the more commonly used batch and slug flow configurations for most reaction conditions by providing shorter substrate diffusion paths and larger interfacial area for the reaction. The potential trade-off between maximized mass transfer and possibly higher enzyme inactivation rates in small droplets with large surface-to-volume ratios was also investigated for the first time, and a pipeline was established to allow evaluation in other reactions. Finally, the effect of surfactant necessary for microdroplet stabilization was also investigated in all reaction setups for the first time, and it was shown that a properly selected surfactant can have a positive effect at low concentrations by creating more stable emulsions and smaller droplets, thus increasing the interfacial area between the two phases.

ACS Applied Materials & InterfacesVol. 17(3)
University of Bremen (DE), Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
2.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.