Using mobile phone survey paradata for process evaluations and improvements: best practices and lessons learned from nine surveys in seven sites

The use of mobile phone surveys (MPS) for regionally or nationally representative data allows for quick, efficient and affordable data collection for monitoring trends and generating results to guide action. By digitizing this process, data flows can be expanded to include metadata and paradata that allow survey administrators to evaluate and improve survey processes and parameters. Between 2017 and early 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provided technical support to country partners to implement MPS gathering indicators on noncommunicable diseases within adult populations in seven countries. These surveys resulted in 37 591 completed interviews containing no personal identifiable information. When combined, these surveys result in over 25 million rows of paradata representing timestamped interactions between the data collection platform and each survey respondent. Using exploratory data analysis, five key metrics were identified which had implications on MPS process optimization: timing of engagement, question randomization, contacts to complete, errors and mode effect. The use of survey paradata allows for real-time process evaluations and identifies factors that can improve efficiency and effectiveness of MPS methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oxford Open Digital Health
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oodh/oqaf003
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using mobile phone survey paradata for process evaluations and improvements: best practices and lessons learned from nine surveys in seven sites

Stacy L. Davlin, Veronica Lea, Rachael Phadnis, Casey Siesel et al.
Oxford Open Digital Health
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
article

Using mobile phone survey paradata for process evaluations and improvements: best practices and lessons learned from nine surveys in seven sites

Stacy L. Davlin, Veronica Lea, Rachael Phadnis, Casey Siesel, Juliette Lee, Tobias Brevik
article en

Abstract

The use of mobile phone surveys (MPS) for regionally or nationally representative data allows for quick, efficient and affordable data collection for monitoring trends and generating results to guide action. By digitizing this process, data flows can be expanded to include metadata and paradata that allow survey administrators to evaluate and improve survey processes and parameters. Between 2017 and early 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provided technical support to country partners to implement MPS gathering indicators on noncommunicable diseases within adult populations in seven countries. These surveys resulted in 37 591 completed interviews containing no personal identifiable information. When combined, these surveys result in over 25 million rows of paradata representing timestamped interactions between the data collection platform and each survey respondent. Using exploratory data analysis, five key metrics were identified which had implications on MPS process optimization: timing of engagement, question randomization, contacts to complete, errors and mode effect. The use of survey paradata allows for real-time process evaluations and identifies factors that can improve efficiency and effectiveness of MPS methods.

Oxford Open Digital HealthVol. 3
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), Center for Global Health (US), CDC Foundation (US)
Bloomberg Philanthropies, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.