Strategies to Increase Response Rate and Reduce Nonresponse Bias in Population Health Research: Analysis of a Series of Randomized Controlled Experiments during a Large COVID-19 Study

Conditional monetary incentives improved response rates to a web-based survey, which required the return of a swab test, particularly for younger age groups. Used in a selective way, incentives may be an effective strategy for improving sample response and representativeness in population-based studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/60022
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies to Increase Response Rate and Reduce Nonresponse Bias in Population Health Research: Analysis of a Series of Randomized Controlled Experiments during a Large COVID-19 Study

Christl Ann Donnelly, Sam Clemens, Helen Ward, Paul Elliott et al.
6 citations
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
25.21
article

Strategies to Increase Response Rate and Reduce Nonresponse Bias in Population Health Research: Analysis of a Series of Randomized Controlled Experiments during a Large COVID-19 Study

Christl Ann Donnelly, Sam Clemens, Helen Ward, Paul Elliott, William Barclay, Nicholas Gilby, Kevin Pickering, Christina Joanne Atchison, Ara Wardkes Darzi, Graham Cooke, Deborah Ashby, Marc Chadeau‐Hyam, Steven Riley, Galini Pantelidou
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Conditional monetary incentives improved response rates to a web-based survey, which required the return of a swab test, particularly for younger age groups. Used in a selective way, incentives may be an effective strategy for improving sample response and representativeness in population-based studies.

JMIR Public Health and SurveillanceVol. 11
University of Oxford (GB), Ipsos (United Kingdom) (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Wellcome Trust, National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit, Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health and Care Research, British Heart Foundation, Department of Health and Social Care, Imperial College London, UK Dementia Research Institute, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Medical Research Council, NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
25.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.