Stream Discharge Determinations Using Slug Additions and Specific Conductance

Abstract Stream discharge is often determined by wading the stream and measuring the point velocity at fixed widths and depths. However, there are conditions when wading measurements are not safe or the measurements are poor because of high turbulence, rocky streambeds, non‐standard velocity distributions, shallow or sheet flow, aquatic plants, or inaccessibility due to ice. Under these conditions, it is often preferable to determine discharge using salt slug addition and downstream measurement of salt concentration with time. A new method for determining stream discharge using specific conductance as a surrogate for salt concentrations is presented. The method adapts an approach that accurately calculates the specific conductance by utilizing ionic molal conductivities to determine the concentration of salt. The method was applied at four mountainous stream sites where a total of twenty‐nine slug‐additions were performed. The discharge determined from the new method was compared to four alternative methods including discharge from continuous injection, slug addition with discrete sample calibration, wading measurements with velocity measurement, and a stream gage. The discharge ranged from 21.5 to 778 L/s and the median difference between the new method and the traditional methods was −0.01%. Additionally, the p‐value (0.75) determined from a paired t ‐test indicates that there is no significant difference between the discharge determined from the new and alternative discharge methods. The primary advantage of the new method is that it obviates the need to collect and analyze discrete samples to accurately quantify the specific conductance‐salt surrogate relationship, allowing for rapid, low‐cost determination of discharge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr037771
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stream Discharge Determinations Using Slug Additions and Specific Conductance

David A. Roth, Richard Blaine McCleskey, Robert L. Runkel, Sheila F. Murphy
2 citations
Water Resources Research
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
1.72
article

Stream Discharge Determinations Using Slug Additions and Specific Conductance

David A. Roth, Richard Blaine McCleskey, Robert L. Runkel, Sheila F. Murphy
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Stream discharge is often determined by wading the stream and measuring the point velocity at fixed widths and depths. However, there are conditions when wading measurements are not safe or the measurements are poor because of high turbulence, rocky streambeds, non‐standard velocity distributions, shallow or sheet flow, aquatic plants, or inaccessibility due to ice. Under these conditions, it is often preferable to determine discharge using salt slug addition and downstream measurement of salt concentration with time. A new method for determining stream discharge using specific conductance as a surrogate for salt concentrations is presented. The method adapts an approach that accurately calculates the specific conductance by utilizing ionic molal conductivities to determine the concentration of salt. The method was applied at four mountainous stream sites where a total of twenty‐nine slug‐additions were performed. The discharge determined from the new method was compared to four alternative methods including discharge from continuous injection, slug addition with discrete sample calibration, wading measurements with velocity measurement, and a stream gage. The discharge ranged from 21.5 to 778 L/s and the median difference between the new method and the traditional methods was −0.01%. Additionally, the p‐value (0.75) determined from a paired t ‐test indicates that there is no significant difference between the discharge determined from the new and alternative discharge methods. The primary advantage of the new method is that it obviates the need to collect and analyze discrete samples to accurately quantify the specific conductance‐salt surrogate relationship, allowing for rapid, low‐cost determination of discharge.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 61(1)
United States Geological Survey (US)
U.S. Geological Survey
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.