Buddhism, Naturalism, and Animism (or Loving Our More-Than-Human Kin): Global Philosophy at Work in an Age of Ecological Crisis

Abstract: There is something deeply broken in how modern industrialized societies relate to the natural world. Many ecological theorists, as well as ecologically engaged Buddhists, draw on Buddhist ideas and practices to construct alternative, more wholesome ways of relating to the natural world. This can be understood as a kind of post-comparative global or “fusion” philosophy at work. In this essay, I reflect on fusion philosophy, Buddhism, and the ecological crisis. I argue against the common practice of naturalizing Buddhism, of adapting Buddhism in order to make it conform with specifically modern ideas about the natural world , and advocate for drawing on Buddhist and animist ways of knowing and being to challenge these ideas and help repair our relationship with the more-than-human world. Specifically, I draw on Buddhist meditative practices, phenomenological critique, and recent thinking about the relational and emotional dimensions of knowledge to suggest a path toward a relational, animist epistemology.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy East and West
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2025.a949583
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Buddhism, Naturalism, and Animism (or Loving Our More-Than-Human Kin): Global Philosophy at Work in an Age of Ecological Crisis

Karin Meyers
Philosophy East and West
Ethics in medical practice
article

Buddhism, Naturalism, and Animism (or Loving Our More-Than-Human Kin): Global Philosophy at Work in an Age of Ecological Crisis

Karin Meyers
article en

Abstract

Abstract: There is something deeply broken in how modern industrialized societies relate to the natural world. Many ecological theorists, as well as ecologically engaged Buddhists, draw on Buddhist ideas and practices to construct alternative, more wholesome ways of relating to the natural world. This can be understood as a kind of post-comparative global or “fusion” philosophy at work. In this essay, I reflect on fusion philosophy, Buddhism, and the ecological crisis. I argue against the common practice of naturalizing Buddhism, of adapting Buddhism in order to make it conform with specifically modern ideas about the natural world , and advocate for drawing on Buddhist and animist ways of knowing and being to challenge these ideas and help repair our relationship with the more-than-human world. Specifically, I draw on Buddhist meditative practices, phenomenological critique, and recent thinking about the relational and emotional dimensions of knowledge to suggest a path toward a relational, animist epistemology.

Philosophy East and WestVol. 75(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.