What research participants say about their research experiences in Empowering the Participant Voice: Outcomes and actionable data

RPPS results from 5045 participants from seven CTSAs provide a valuable evidence base for evaluating participants' research experiences and using participant feedback to improve research programs. Analyses revealed opportunities for improving research practices. Sites piloting local change initiatives based on RPPS findings demonstrated measurable positive impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.3
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What research participants say about their research experiences in Empowering the Participant Voice: Outcomes and actionable data

Rhonda G. Kost, Ann Dozier, Carrie Dykes, Adam Qureshi et al.
6 citations
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Ethics in Clinical Research
11.27
article

What research participants say about their research experiences in Empowering the Participant Voice: Outcomes and actionable data

Rhonda G. Kost, Ann Dozier, Carrie Dykes, Adam Qureshi, Lisa Connally, Jamie Roberts, Caroline S. Jiang, Nancy Green, Ranee Chatterjee, Sierra Lindo, Alex Cheng, Daniel E. Ford, Liz Martinez, Joseph Andrews, Natalie Schlesinger, Karen Marder, Sana Khoury-Shakour
article en
6 citations

Abstract

RPPS results from 5045 participants from seven CTSAs provide a valuable evidence base for evaluating participants' research experiences and using participant feedback to improve research programs. Analyses revealed opportunities for improving research practices. Sites piloting local change initiatives based on RPPS findings demonstrated measurable positive impact.

Journal of Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 9(1)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Duke University (US), University of California, Santa Cruz (US), Vanderbilt University (US), University of Michigan (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Cancer Institute (WIA) (IN), University of California System (US), Clinical Research Institute (US), Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Duke Cancer Institute, University of Rochester (US), Rockefeller University (US)
Vanderbilt University, Johns Hopkins University, University of Rochester, University of Cambridge, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ethics in Clinical Research
11.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.