Utility of Artificial Intelligence for Decision Making in Thoracic Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The aim of this study was to analyze whether the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically the Natural Language Processing (NLP) branch developed by OpenAI, could help a thoracic multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) make decisions if provided with all of the patient data presented to the committee and supported by accepted clinical practice guidelines. <b>Methods</b>: This is a retrospective comparative study. The inclusion criteria were defined as all patients who presented at the thoracic MTB with a suspicious or first diagnosis of non-small-cell lung cancer between January 2023 and June 2023. Intervention: GPT 3.5 turbo chat was used, providing the clinical case summary presented in committee proceedings and the latest SEPAR lung cancer treatment guidelines. The application was asked to issue one of the following recommendations: follow-up, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy. Statistical analysis: A concordance analysis was performed by measuring the Kappa coefficient to evaluate the consistency between the results of the AI and the committee's decision. <b>Results</b>: Fifty-two patients were included in the study. The AI had an overall concordance of 76%, with a Kappa index of 0.59 and a consistency and replicability of 92.3% for the patients in whom it recommended surgery (after repeating the cases four times). <b>Conclusions</b>: AI is an interesting tool which could help in decision making in MTBs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14020399
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utility of Artificial Intelligence for Decision Making in Thoracic Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards

Jon A. Lizarbe, Arantza Fernández-Monge, Jon Zabaleta, Borja Aguinagalde et al.
14 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
9.16
article

Utility of Artificial Intelligence for Decision Making in Thoracic Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards

Jon A. Lizarbe, Arantza Fernández-Monge, Jon Zabaleta, Borja Aguinagalde, Juan A. Ferrer-Bonsoms, Iker López, María Mainer, Mateo de Assas
article en
14 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The aim of this study was to analyze whether the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically the Natural Language Processing (NLP) branch developed by OpenAI, could help a thoracic multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) make decisions if provided with all of the patient data presented to the committee and supported by accepted clinical practice guidelines. <b>Methods</b>: This is a retrospective comparative study. The inclusion criteria were defined as all patients who presented at the thoracic MTB with a suspicious or first diagnosis of non-small-cell lung cancer between January 2023 and June 2023. Intervention: GPT 3.5 turbo chat was used, providing the clinical case summary presented in committee proceedings and the latest SEPAR lung cancer treatment guidelines. The application was asked to issue one of the following recommendations: follow-up, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy. Statistical analysis: A concordance analysis was performed by measuring the Kappa coefficient to evaluate the consistency between the results of the AI and the committee's decision. <b>Results</b>: Fifty-two patients were included in the study. The AI had an overall concordance of 76%, with a Kappa index of 0.59 and a consistency and replicability of 92.3% for the patients in whom it recommended surgery (after repeating the cases four times). <b>Conclusions</b>: AI is an interesting tool which could help in decision making in MTBs.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(2)
Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
9.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.