Consideration of culture in Canadian courtrooms: Before and after the Divorce Act amendments

Abstract In Canada, the federal Divorce Act was revised in 2021 to include enumerated best interests factors which include a child's linguistic, religious, cultural, and spiritual heritage and upbringing, including Indigenous heritage. In this study, the authors examine how Canadian courtrooms engaged in the consideration of cultural factors prior to the recent Divorce Act amendments and compare these findings to decisions published following the amendments that mandated this specific consideration. Specific manners in which the courts have considered culture are identified, and the resulting three ‘clusters’ of decisions—including those cases (a) prioritizing a child's established culture, (b) weighing the child's greater involvement with one culture versus increased bicultural competence, and (c) considering the effect on the child of the cultural interaction—are compared pre‐ and post‐ the recent Divorce Act amendments. Implications for family court professionals are discussed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Family Court Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12842
Primary Topic
Marriage and Sexual Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consideration of culture in Canadian courtrooms: Before and after the Divorce Act amendments

Terry Singh, Traci Bannister, Marc Massie
1 links
Family Court Review
Marriage and Sexual Relationships
article

Consideration of culture in Canadian courtrooms: Before and after the Divorce Act amendments

Terry Singh, Traci Bannister, Marc Massie
article en

Abstract

Abstract In Canada, the federal Divorce Act was revised in 2021 to include enumerated best interests factors which include a child's linguistic, religious, cultural, and spiritual heritage and upbringing, including Indigenous heritage. In this study, the authors examine how Canadian courtrooms engaged in the consideration of cultural factors prior to the recent Divorce Act amendments and compare these findings to decisions published following the amendments that mandated this specific consideration. Specific manners in which the courts have considered culture are identified, and the resulting three ‘clusters’ of decisions—including those cases (a) prioritizing a child's established culture, (b) weighing the child's greater involvement with one culture versus increased bicultural competence, and (c) considering the effect on the child of the cultural interaction—are compared pre‐ and post‐ the recent Divorce Act amendments. Implications for family court professionals are discussed.

Family Court ReviewVol. 63(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Marriage and Sexual Relationships
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Consideration of culture in Canadian courtrooms: Before and after the Divorce Act amendments — Terry Singh, Traci Bannister, et al. · Family Court Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS