<scp>WHEN WE WERE ALMOST MODERN</scp>? Theory, Methods and Politics in <i>The Centre for Environmental Studies</i>, 1966–1975

Abstract This article re‐examines the history of the UK Centre for Environmental Studies (CES) between 1966 and 1975. Using archival materials and interviews, the article details the role of the CES in attempts to ‘modernize’ urban and regional research and working relationships between the academy and government. The CES is probably best known, by readers of this journal, as the initial editorial base for the International Journal of Urban and Regional Research ( IJURR ) and for its role in incubating radical urbanism. However, as we show, these activities sat alongside important early developments in both computational social science and radical experiments in the use of the social sciences in policymaking, in ways that have, hitherto, not been well understood. The article is not intended as an exercise in nostalgia but, rather, one that gestures towards what Mark Fisher termed a ‘hauntological’ form of analysis; to quote Fisher, ‘[w]hen the present has given up on the future’ there is value in listening ‘for the relics of the future in the unactivated potentials of the past’.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13298
Primary Topic
Data Analysis and Archiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

WHEN WE WERE ALMOST MODERN? Theory, Methods and Politics in The Centre for Environmental Studies, 1966–1975

Roger Burrows, Julián Bernal Molina
International Journal of Urban and Regional Research
Data Analysis and Archiving
article

WHEN WE WERE ALMOST MODERN? Theory, Methods and Politics in The Centre for Environmental Studies, 1966–1975

Roger Burrows, Julián Bernal Molina
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article re‐examines the history of the UK Centre for Environmental Studies (CES) between 1966 and 1975. Using archival materials and interviews, the article details the role of the CES in attempts to ‘modernize’ urban and regional research and working relationships between the academy and government. The CES is probably best known, by readers of this journal, as the initial editorial base for the International Journal of Urban and Regional Research ( IJURR ) and for its role in incubating radical urbanism. However, as we show, these activities sat alongside important early developments in both computational social science and radical experiments in the use of the social sciences in policymaking, in ways that have, hitherto, not been well understood. The article is not intended as an exercise in nostalgia but, rather, one that gestures towards what Mark Fisher termed a ‘hauntological’ form of analysis; to quote Fisher, ‘[w]hen the present has given up on the future’ there is value in listening ‘for the relics of the future in the unactivated potentials of the past’.

International Journal of Urban and Regional ResearchVol. 49(2)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Data Analysis and Archiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.