Pseudo-empirical likelihood methods for causal inference

Causal inference remains a key area of research for assessing treatment effects across various real-world settings. This paper introduces two inferential procedures for the average treatment effect (ATE) using a two-sample pseudo-empirical likelihood (PEL) approach. The first procedure uses estimated propensity scores for the formulation of the PEL function, yielding a maximum PEL estimator equivalent to the inverse probability weighted estimator. Our focus in this scenario is on the PEL ratio statistic and establishing its theoretical properties. The second procedure incorporates outcome regression models for doubly robust PEL inference. We establish the asymptotic distribution of the PEL ratio statistic and also propose a bootstrap method for constructing confidence intervals to bypass a scaling constant involved in the asymptotic distribution of the PEL ratio statistic that is very difficult to calculate. Simulation studies and an real data application illustrate the performance of our proposed methods with comparisons to existing ones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronic Journal of Statistics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1214/24-ejs2338
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pseudo-empirical likelihood methods for causal inference

Leilei Zeng, Changbao Wu, Jingyue Huang
1 citations
Electronic Journal of Statistics
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
2.63
article

Pseudo-empirical likelihood methods for causal inference

Leilei Zeng, Changbao Wu, Jingyue Huang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Causal inference remains a key area of research for assessing treatment effects across various real-world settings. This paper introduces two inferential procedures for the average treatment effect (ATE) using a two-sample pseudo-empirical likelihood (PEL) approach. The first procedure uses estimated propensity scores for the formulation of the PEL function, yielding a maximum PEL estimator equivalent to the inverse probability weighted estimator. Our focus in this scenario is on the PEL ratio statistic and establishing its theoretical properties. The second procedure incorporates outcome regression models for doubly robust PEL inference. We establish the asymptotic distribution of the PEL ratio statistic and also propose a bootstrap method for constructing confidence intervals to bypass a scaling constant involved in the asymptotic distribution of the PEL ratio statistic that is very difficult to calculate. Simulation studies and an real data application illustrate the performance of our proposed methods with comparisons to existing ones.

Electronic Journal of StatisticsVol. 19(1)
University of Waterloo (CA), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pseudo-empirical likelihood methods for causal inference — Leilei Zeng, Changbao Wu, et al. · Electronic Journal of Statistics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS