Beyond narrow definitions: Quantifying school privatisation across countries and over time

The OECD reported that the proportions of students enrolled in ‘private schools’ have remained stable since 2000. Drawing on the concepts of endogenous and exogenous privatisation, we question this statement, arguing that school privatisation can be disaggregated into four dimensions: private provision, restricted access, school competition and school autonomy. We operationalise these dimensions using indicators from the PISA school questionnaire. We explore changes cross-nationally between 2000 and 2018 in 35 educational systems, revealing increases in secondary school competition dynamics over time and some cases of substantial increases in autonomous school-level decision-making. We also provide an up-to-date landscape of school privatisation for 64 countries in 2018 and highlight the relevance of using a wide set of indicators to report the extent of privatisation, accounting for both endogenous and exogenous sides of the phenomenon. Finally, we discuss ways in which cross-national quantitative data collection on schools might be developed to produce a more appropriate quantification of privatisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Educational Research Journal
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041241312274
Primary Topic
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond narrow definitions: Quantifying school privatisation across countries and over time

Sonia Exley, Gabriel Gutiérrez
European Educational Research Journal
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
article

Beyond narrow definitions: Quantifying school privatisation across countries and over time

Sonia Exley, Gabriel Gutiérrez
article en

Abstract

The OECD reported that the proportions of students enrolled in ‘private schools’ have remained stable since 2000. Drawing on the concepts of endogenous and exogenous privatisation, we question this statement, arguing that school privatisation can be disaggregated into four dimensions: private provision, restricted access, school competition and school autonomy. We operationalise these dimensions using indicators from the PISA school questionnaire. We explore changes cross-nationally between 2000 and 2018 in 35 educational systems, revealing increases in secondary school competition dynamics over time and some cases of substantial increases in autonomous school-level decision-making. We also provide an up-to-date landscape of school privatisation for 64 countries in 2018 and highlight the relevance of using a wide set of indicators to report the extent of privatisation, accounting for both endogenous and exogenous sides of the phenomenon. Finally, we discuss ways in which cross-national quantitative data collection on schools might be developed to produce a more appropriate quantification of privatisation.

European Educational Research JournalVol. 24(4)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond narrow definitions: Quantifying school privatisation across countries and over time — Sonia Exley, Gabriel Gutiérrez · European Educational Research Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS