Changing Disability Status and Changes in Health, Participation Restrictions and Activity Limitations in Denmark: Does the Choice of Measure Matter?

Significant proportions of individuals respond inconsistently over time to disability questions in surveys. However, it is unclear why such changes in disability status arise. This study is the first to explore the prevalence and determinants of changes in disability status for two internationally recognized and widely used disability survey measures: the Washington Group Short Set on Functioning (WG-SS) and the Global Activity Limitation Indicator (GALI). We use Danish longitudinal survey data collected in 2016 and 2020 on 10,586 respondents aged 16–64 to systematically compare within-person changes in disability status. For both measures, changing disability status is more prevalent than consistent disability status. Moreover, changing disability status is associated with the corresponding changes in health, participation restrictions and activity limitations. Individuals with consistent disability status are in a more disadvantaged situation than individuals with changing disability status. Including questions about duration of disability in surveys may help identify respondents affected by accumulated disability-related disadvantage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.1191
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changing Disability Status and Changes in Health, Participation Restrictions and Activity Limitations in Denmark: Does the Choice of Measure Matter?

Mads Lybech Christensen, Anna Amilon
3 citations
Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
Health disparities and outcomes
6.50
article

Changing Disability Status and Changes in Health, Participation Restrictions and Activity Limitations in Denmark: Does the Choice of Measure Matter?

Mads Lybech Christensen, Anna Amilon
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Significant proportions of individuals respond inconsistently over time to disability questions in surveys. However, it is unclear why such changes in disability status arise. This study is the first to explore the prevalence and determinants of changes in disability status for two internationally recognized and widely used disability survey measures: the Washington Group Short Set on Functioning (WG-SS) and the Global Activity Limitation Indicator (GALI). We use Danish longitudinal survey data collected in 2016 and 2020 on 10,586 respondents aged 16–64 to systematically compare within-person changes in disability status. For both measures, changing disability status is more prevalent than consistent disability status. Moreover, changing disability status is associated with the corresponding changes in health, participation restrictions and activity limitations. Individuals with consistent disability status are in a more disadvantaged situation than individuals with changing disability status. Including questions about duration of disability in surveys may help identify respondents affected by accumulated disability-related disadvantage.

Scandinavian Journal of Disability ResearchVol. 27(1)
VIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Research (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health disparities and outcomes
6.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.