The Comparison of the Historical Memory Narratives in Japan and the FRG After the Second World War

The article is devoted to identifying the similarities and differences in the historical memory of Japan and the FRG after World War II. These issues are a relevant topic for research in the face of the enduring influence of historical grievances on Japan’s relations with its former victims, in contrast to similar relations of Germany. As a theoretical framework, the paper uses O. Malinova’s approach, which interprets historical memory as a product of social construction and a variation of symbolic politics. In addition, the author used the classification of historical memory proposed by M. Dian. In the scope of the study, the author examines the impact of occupation policies on further development of historical memory in the two countries. The paper compares the original content of the main narratives of memory of the past in each country, the main mnemonic actors promoting them, and the evolution of these narratives from the end of the war to the present day.The author also highlights the reasons for the differences in the content and evolution of the narratives in Japan and the FRG. The author concludes that, despite a certain similarity of the occupation policy in the two countries, as well as the formation of two traditions (conservative and left-progressive) in historical memory of each of the countries, its content and evolution are seriously different. In the FRG, the conservative tradition initially included the narratives of self-victimization and amnesia, while the progressive tradition included the narrative of repentance; over the years, however, the traditions have evolved from polarization to a consensus around repentance and elements of self-victimization. In Japan, the conservative tradition initially included glorification of the past in addition to self-victimization, i.e., it was more revisionist, while the progressive tradition focused on self-victimization rather than repentance. Over time, the traditions shifted from a consensus around selfvictimization to a sharp polarization: progressives moved to a repentance narrative, while revisionists gained ground among conservatives.