Evaluating Differences in College Students’ Planned Happenstance Skills on the Basis of Disability Status

College students with and without disabilities completed measures of Planned Happenstance Skills (PHS) and reported their demographic attributes (i.e., age, year of study, gender, race/ethnicity, SES, disability status). In general, the result shows that disability status, gender, race/ethnicity, and year of study were significant predictors of PHS levels. We also examined the magnitude of differences in PHS in each dimension (i.e., curiosity, flexibility, persistence, optimism, and risk-taking) between college students with and without disabilities after controlling for the key covariates. The result shows that college students with disabilities generally exhibited similar and slightly higher PHS levels compared to their counterparts without disabilities. Possible explanations of the results and limitations are discussed, along with implications for research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434241311820
Primary Topic
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Differences in College Students’ Planned Happenstance Skills on the Basis of Disability Status

Michael L. Wehmeyer, James R. Thompson, Tyler A. Hicks, Vidya D. Munandar et al.
1 links
Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
article

Evaluating Differences in College Students’ Planned Happenstance Skills on the Basis of Disability Status

Michael L. Wehmeyer, James R. Thompson, Tyler A. Hicks, Vidya D. Munandar, Arpita Ghosh
article en

Abstract

College students with and without disabilities completed measures of Planned Happenstance Skills (PHS) and reported their demographic attributes (i.e., age, year of study, gender, race/ethnicity, SES, disability status). In general, the result shows that disability status, gender, race/ethnicity, and year of study were significant predictors of PHS levels. We also examined the magnitude of differences in PHS in each dimension (i.e., curiosity, flexibility, persistence, optimism, and risk-taking) between college students with and without disabilities after controlling for the key covariates. The result shows that college students with disabilities generally exhibited similar and slightly higher PHS levels compared to their counterparts without disabilities. Possible explanations of the results and limitations are discussed, along with implications for research and practice.

Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals
University of Kansas (US), Kennesaw State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Differences in College Students’ Planned Happenstance Skills on the Basis of Disability Status — Michael L. Wehmeyer, James R. Thompson, et al. · Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS