Geophysical imaging of the subsurface seismic structure of the Chestnut Hill Reservoir earth embankment dam (Massachusetts)

Abstract Degradation within a manmade earth embankment structure is often unobservable from the surface. In order to evaluate the structural integrity of earth embankment levees and dams and identify subsurface zones of weakness that may result in the future failures of such structures, various geophysical methods have been proposed as effective subsurface imaging tools. This study presents the results of using the horizontal‐to‐vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) of seismic noise, seismic refraction analysis and multi‐channel analysis of seismic surface waves (MASW) to estimate subsurface seismic structures for the Chestnut Hill Reservoir earth embankment dam in Chestnut Hill, MA. The HVSR method is used to estimate site fundamental frequency from ambient seismic noise recordings. The fundamental frequency () at a site can be used to estimate depth to bedrock with a known/estimated surface shear‐wave velocity. The MASW and seismic refraction analysis methods are used to estimate seismic velocity structures from seismic refraction lines with active sources. The depth‐to‐bedrock estimates from the seismic refraction analysis and MASW performed in this study confirm that the HVSR method is able to effectively estimate depth to bedrock at sites atop an earth embankment. The MASW was found to resolve a low‐velocity zone in the subsurface seismic structure at the Chestnut Hill Reservoir embankment that the seismic refraction method was unable to image, and this low‐velocity zone is required to best fit a theoretical HVSR to an observed spectrum. Furthermore, the variation and uncertainty in fundamental frequency estimation were quantified by making repeated HVSR measurements at the reservoir embankment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Near Surface Geophysics
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12330
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Seismic Waves and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geophysical imaging of the subsurface seismic structure of the Chestnut Hill Reservoir earth embankment dam (Massachusetts)

John E. Ebel, Steven J. Maniscalco
3 citations
Near Surface Geophysics
Seismic Waves and Analysis
5.60
article

Geophysical imaging of the subsurface seismic structure of the Chestnut Hill Reservoir earth embankment dam (Massachusetts)

John E. Ebel, Steven J. Maniscalco
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Degradation within a manmade earth embankment structure is often unobservable from the surface. In order to evaluate the structural integrity of earth embankment levees and dams and identify subsurface zones of weakness that may result in the future failures of such structures, various geophysical methods have been proposed as effective subsurface imaging tools. This study presents the results of using the horizontal‐to‐vertical spectral ratio (HVSR) of seismic noise, seismic refraction analysis and multi‐channel analysis of seismic surface waves (MASW) to estimate subsurface seismic structures for the Chestnut Hill Reservoir earth embankment dam in Chestnut Hill, MA. The HVSR method is used to estimate site fundamental frequency from ambient seismic noise recordings. The fundamental frequency () at a site can be used to estimate depth to bedrock with a known/estimated surface shear‐wave velocity. The MASW and seismic refraction analysis methods are used to estimate seismic velocity structures from seismic refraction lines with active sources. The depth‐to‐bedrock estimates from the seismic refraction analysis and MASW performed in this study confirm that the HVSR method is able to effectively estimate depth to bedrock at sites atop an earth embankment. The MASW was found to resolve a low‐velocity zone in the subsurface seismic structure at the Chestnut Hill Reservoir embankment that the seismic refraction method was unable to image, and this low‐velocity zone is required to best fit a theoretical HVSR to an observed spectrum. Furthermore, the variation and uncertainty in fundamental frequency estimation were quantified by making repeated HVSR measurements at the reservoir embankment.

Near Surface GeophysicsVol. 23(2)
Boston College (US)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Seismic Waves and Analysis
5.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.