Common pitfalls in oncology drug applications aiming for conditional marketing authorization

Early approval mechanisms, such as conditional approval in the EU, have been used extensively to provide timely access to therapeutic innovations to cancer patients with unmet medical needs. While based on promising early evidence, such approvals are challenging from many perspectives due to the lack of comprehensive data. The limitation typically relates to data that demonstrates clinical benefit via early endpoints and is only acceptable when the early evidence is particularly convincing to assume that the benefits of early access are greater than the potential harms. This paper describes the requirements for conditional approval and presents common pitfalls in oncology, such as misunderstandings about the strength of evidence from exploratory trials and secondary analyses, lack of planning and opportunities to improve communication. Thereafter, we present a framework ('EDGE') on how to improve the submission and evaluation of drug applications for conditional approval in the EU.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16383
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Common pitfalls in oncology drug applications aiming for conditional marketing authorization

Simona Stankevičiūtė, Sinan B. Sarac, Jorge Camarero, Amy S. McKee et al.
1 citations
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
3.13
article

Common pitfalls in oncology drug applications aiming for conditional marketing authorization

Simona Stankevičiūtė, Sinan B. Sarac, Jorge Camarero, Amy S. McKee, Peter Kiely
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Early approval mechanisms, such as conditional approval in the EU, have been used extensively to provide timely access to therapeutic innovations to cancer patients with unmet medical needs. While based on promising early evidence, such approvals are challenging from many perspectives due to the lack of comprehensive data. The limitation typically relates to data that demonstrates clinical benefit via early endpoints and is only acceptable when the early evidence is particularly convincing to assume that the benefits of early access are greater than the potential harms. This paper describes the requirements for conditional approval and presents common pitfalls in oncology, such as misunderstandings about the strength of evidence from exploratory trials and secondary analyses, lack of planning and opportunities to improve communication. Thereafter, we present a framework ('EDGE') on how to improve the submission and evaluation of drug applications for conditional approval in the EU.

British Journal of Clinical PharmacologyVol. 91(3)
PAREXEL International (United States) (US), MSD (Spain) (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Common pitfalls in oncology drug applications aiming for conditional marketing authorization — Simona Stankevičiūtė, Sinan B. Sarac, et al. · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS