REGIONAL RATINGS AS A TOOL FOR ASSESSING THEIR SUSTAIN-ABILITY (BASED ON THE ANALYSIS OF ESG-RATINGS FOR THE SUBJECTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN FEDERAL DISTRICT)

A brief retrospective of the compilation of ESG ratings and regional rankings is considered. Two national approaches to rating have been identified: the RAEX rating Group and the National Rating Agency (NRA) together with the ESG Laboratory of Lomonosov Moscow State University. Using the example of a set of subjects that are the part of the Northwestern Federal District, a comparative analysis of the results of two designated approaches to the construction of ESG ratings is carried out. The conclusion is made about their unreliability as a sources of objective information.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52897/978-5-7310-6547-4-2024-18-196-202
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

REGIONAL RATINGS AS A TOOL FOR ASSESSING THEIR SUSTAIN-ABILITY (BASED ON THE ANALYSIS OF ESG-RATINGS FOR THE SUBJECTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN FEDERAL DISTRICT)

Mikhail G. Djanelidze, N.N. Shestakova
Environmental Sustainability and Technology
article

REGIONAL RATINGS AS A TOOL FOR ASSESSING THEIR SUSTAIN-ABILITY (BASED ON THE ANALYSIS OF ESG-RATINGS FOR THE SUBJECTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN FEDERAL DISTRICT)

Mikhail G. Djanelidze, N.N. Shestakova
article en

Abstract

A brief retrospective of the compilation of ESG ratings and regional rankings is considered. Two national approaches to rating have been identified: the RAEX rating Group and the National Rating Agency (NRA) together with the ESG Laboratory of Lomonosov Moscow State University. Using the example of a set of subjects that are the part of the Northwestern Federal District, a comparative analysis of the results of two designated approaches to the construction of ESG ratings is carried out. The conclusion is made about their unreliability as a sources of objective information.

Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Environmental Sustainability and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.