Selection of solvents for integrated <scp>CO₂</scp> absorption and electrochemical reduction systems

Abstract Solvent‐based electrochemical CO 2 reduction (CO 2 R) enables the production of chemicals or fuels using CO 2 from a preceding absorption process. Employing previously tested CO 2 capture solvents does not ensure their suitability for either CO 2 R or integrated CO 2 absorption‐reduction. We propose solvent selection criteria that include the CO 2 solubility, kinetic constant, ionic conductivity, concentration of the bicarbonate, carbamate, and solvent cation in the CO 2 ‐loaded solution, and sustainability indicators. They are implemented for solvent selection (a) from novel, aqueous mixtures of N ‐methylcyclohexylamine (MCA) with piperazine (PZ), 2‐amino‐2‐methyl‐1‐propanol (AMP), potassium hydroxide (KOH), and potassium chloride (KCl) and (b) from aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA), AMP, KOH, MCA, and PZ solutions. Versions of a modified Kent‐Eisenberg model for strong bases, carbamate, and non‐carbamate‐forming amine solutions are developed and parameterized through experimental equilibrium measurements. CO 2 R experimental results are presented for solutions of KOH and MCA + KOH, as these indicate desired trade‐offs for CO 2 absorption and reduction.