Thermodynamic Assessment of Different Feedstocks Gasification Using Supercritical Water and CO2 for Hydrogen and Methane Production

The supercritical water gasification (SCWG) and carbon dioxide gasification of agro-industrial and urban waste residues—Coffee Husk, Eucalyptus Biochar, Energy Sugarcane, and Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF)—were studied using TeS® v.2 software, which employs a non-stoichiometric thermodynamic model to minimize Gibbs free energy and predict equilibrium compositions. The effects of temperature (873.15–1273.15 K), pressure (220–260 bar), biomass feed (18–69%), and gasifying agents on hydrogen and methane formation were analyzed. Higher temperatures and biomass feed percentages favored hydrogen production, while lower temperatures increased methane formation. At 1273.15 K, RDF showed the highest hydrogen yield in SCWG, rising from 0.43 to 1.42 mol, followed by Energy Sugarcane (0.39 to 1.23 mol), Coffee Husk (0.34 to 0.74 mol), and Eucalyptus Biochar (0.33 to 0.62 mol). In CO2 gasification, hydrogen yields were lower but followed a similar trend. At 873.15 K, RDF also exhibited the highest methane increase in SCWG, from 0.14 to 0.91 mol, followed by Energy Sugarcane (0.12 to 0.65 mol), Coffee Husk (0.11 to 0.36 mol), and Eucalyptus Biochar (0.11 to 0.29 mol). Methane formation in CO2 gasification was significantly lower, with RDF increasing from 0.0035 to 0.35 mol, followed by Energy Sugarcane (0.0024 to 0.24 mol), Coffee Husk (0.0002 to 0.058 mol), and Eucalyptus Biochar (0.0002 to 0.028 mol). On the other hand, a slight increase in hydrogen formation was observed as pressure decreased, while the opposite effect was observed for methane formation, with a small increase in its production as pressure increased. The impact of pressure change on the equilibrium compositions was not as significant as the effect observed by varying temperature; this behavior was observed in both gasification processes studied. Additionally, the behavior of the H2/CO molar ratio for each biomass in the studied gasification processes was analyzed to assess the potential uses of the produced syngas. It was observed that the SCWG resulted in significantly higher H2/CO molar ratios compared to CO2 gasification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eng—Advances in Engineering
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6010012
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.07

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thermodynamic Assessment of Different Feedstocks Gasification Using Supercritical Water and CO2 for Hydrogen and Methane Production

Adriano Pinto Mariano, Ícaro Augusto Maccari Zelioli, Juan F. Pérez, L. Caraballo et al.
9 citations
Eng—Advances in Engineering
Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
6.07
article

Thermodynamic Assessment of Different Feedstocks Gasification Using Supercritical Water and CO2 for Hydrogen and Methane Production

Adriano Pinto Mariano, Ícaro Augusto Maccari Zelioli, Juan F. Pérez, L. Caraballo, York Castillo Santiago, Julles Mitoura dos Santos
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The supercritical water gasification (SCWG) and carbon dioxide gasification of agro-industrial and urban waste residues—Coffee Husk, Eucalyptus Biochar, Energy Sugarcane, and Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF)—were studied using TeS® v.2 software, which employs a non-stoichiometric thermodynamic model to minimize Gibbs free energy and predict equilibrium compositions. The effects of temperature (873.15–1273.15 K), pressure (220–260 bar), biomass feed (18–69%), and gasifying agents on hydrogen and methane formation were analyzed. Higher temperatures and biomass feed percentages favored hydrogen production, while lower temperatures increased methane formation. At 1273.15 K, RDF showed the highest hydrogen yield in SCWG, rising from 0.43 to 1.42 mol, followed by Energy Sugarcane (0.39 to 1.23 mol), Coffee Husk (0.34 to 0.74 mol), and Eucalyptus Biochar (0.33 to 0.62 mol). In CO2 gasification, hydrogen yields were lower but followed a similar trend. At 873.15 K, RDF also exhibited the highest methane increase in SCWG, from 0.14 to 0.91 mol, followed by Energy Sugarcane (0.12 to 0.65 mol), Coffee Husk (0.11 to 0.36 mol), and Eucalyptus Biochar (0.11 to 0.29 mol). Methane formation in CO2 gasification was significantly lower, with RDF increasing from 0.0035 to 0.35 mol, followed by Energy Sugarcane (0.0024 to 0.24 mol), Coffee Husk (0.0002 to 0.058 mol), and Eucalyptus Biochar (0.0002 to 0.028 mol). On the other hand, a slight increase in hydrogen formation was observed as pressure decreased, while the opposite effect was observed for methane formation, with a small increase in its production as pressure increased. The impact of pressure change on the equilibrium compositions was not as significant as the effect observed by varying temperature; this behavior was observed in both gasification processes studied. Additionally, the behavior of the H2/CO molar ratio for each biomass in the studied gasification processes was analyzed to assess the potential uses of the produced syngas. It was observed that the SCWG resulted in significantly higher H2/CO molar ratios compared to CO2 gasification.

Eng—Advances in EngineeringVol. 6(1)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Universidad de Antioquia (CO)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
6.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.