Comparative Assessment of Biomass and Power-to-Gas Processes Integrated with Different Electricity-Driven Gasification Technologies

To develop a biomass and power-to-gas (BPtG) process for renewable electricity storage and sustainable synthetic natural gas (SNG) production, this work investigated five BPtG processes integrated with different electricity-driven gasification technologies based on simulation data. These processes were evaluated for SNG composition and yield, life-cycle energy and exergy efficiencies, life-cycle carbon emissions, and the equivalent unit production cost. The results show that the energy and exergy efficiencies of SNG from those processes range between 53.1 and 58.6% and 36.4 and 41.1%, respectively. Based on the energy allocation method, the carbon emissions without and with CO2 capture ranges from 22.0 to 34.8 and from −43.4 to −17.6, respectively, in gCO2e/MJSNG. These BPtG processes can produce low-carbon SNG and even achieve negative carbon emissions with CO2 capture. Both feedstock and electricity costs have significant influences on the profitability of the processes. The BPtG process integrated with resistance heating gasification, plasma-assisted gasification, and moderate water electrolysis are recommended for their compromise of multi-perspective performances. This paper provided the orders of the five processes based on these indicators and recommendations for different applicable scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clean Technologies
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol7010007
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Assessment of Biomass and Power-to-Gas Processes Integrated with Different Electricity-Driven Gasification Technologies

Xiaobo Cui, Wei Zheng, Liang Wang, Guohui Song
2 citations
Clean Technologies
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
1.06
article

Comparative Assessment of Biomass and Power-to-Gas Processes Integrated with Different Electricity-Driven Gasification Technologies

Xiaobo Cui, Wei Zheng, Liang Wang, Guohui Song
article en
2 citations

Abstract

To develop a biomass and power-to-gas (BPtG) process for renewable electricity storage and sustainable synthetic natural gas (SNG) production, this work investigated five BPtG processes integrated with different electricity-driven gasification technologies based on simulation data. These processes were evaluated for SNG composition and yield, life-cycle energy and exergy efficiencies, life-cycle carbon emissions, and the equivalent unit production cost. The results show that the energy and exergy efficiencies of SNG from those processes range between 53.1 and 58.6% and 36.4 and 41.1%, respectively. Based on the energy allocation method, the carbon emissions without and with CO2 capture ranges from 22.0 to 34.8 and from −43.4 to −17.6, respectively, in gCO2e/MJSNG. These BPtG processes can produce low-carbon SNG and even achieve negative carbon emissions with CO2 capture. Both feedstock and electricity costs have significant influences on the profitability of the processes. The BPtG process integrated with resistance heating gasification, plasma-assisted gasification, and moderate water electrolysis are recommended for their compromise of multi-perspective performances. This paper provided the orders of the five processes based on these indicators and recommendations for different applicable scenarios.

Clean TechnologiesVol. 7(1)
Nanjing Institute of Technology (CN), Southeast University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Government of Jiangsu Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
1.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.