An Overview of Transgenic Mouse Models for the Study of Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia, and no cure is currently available. The β-amyloid cascade of AD and neurofibrillary tangles are the basis of the current understanding of AD pathogenesis, driving drug investigation and other discoveries. Up until now, no AD models have entirely validated the β-amyloid cascade hypothesis. AD models must be capable of recapitulating the critical events of this pathology, including β-amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. The development of plaques is probably derived from the amyloid precursor protein (APP) and presenilin 1 (PS1) familial Alzheimer’s disease (FAD) mutations, while the tangle-like pathology is determined by tau mutations. Transgenic mouse models struggle to replicate the entire spectrum of AD, particularly neuronal death stemming from β-amyloid and tau pathologies. Furthermore, the success of these transgenic mice often relies on the overexpression of APP transgenes enclosing FAD-associated mutations at levels beyond physiological. Ultimate species-specific discrepancies in genome and protein composition between the human and the mouse may hinder the accurate recapitulation of AD pathological events in mouse models. Although none of the AD models fully mirrors human pathology, these experimental in vivo animal models have provided valuable insights into β-amyloid toxicity and the overall pathophysiological basis of AD. Therefore, these experimental models have been widely used in the preclinical evaluation of therapeutic strategies and have played a pivotal role in the development of immunotherapies for AD. In this review, we sum up the main transgenic mouse models used for AD research, whether they are APP mutation-based mice, APP plus presenilin mutation-based mice, or tau mutation-based mice. The specific characteristics of each mouse model and the significance of their use for AD research, focusing on their current advantages and disadvantages, as well as on the progress made and the forthcoming challenges in replicating this neurodegenerative disease, are also highlighted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of dementia and Alzheimer's disease
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jdad2010002
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Overview of Transgenic Mouse Models for the Study of Alzheimer’s Disease

Paula A. Lopes, José Luis Guil‐Guerrero, Mafalda Soares Pádua
1 citations
Journal of dementia and Alzheimer's disease
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
1.50
article

An Overview of Transgenic Mouse Models for the Study of Alzheimer’s Disease

Paula A. Lopes, José Luis Guil‐Guerrero, Mafalda Soares Pádua
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia, and no cure is currently available. The β-amyloid cascade of AD and neurofibrillary tangles are the basis of the current understanding of AD pathogenesis, driving drug investigation and other discoveries. Up until now, no AD models have entirely validated the β-amyloid cascade hypothesis. AD models must be capable of recapitulating the critical events of this pathology, including β-amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. The development of plaques is probably derived from the amyloid precursor protein (APP) and presenilin 1 (PS1) familial Alzheimer’s disease (FAD) mutations, while the tangle-like pathology is determined by tau mutations. Transgenic mouse models struggle to replicate the entire spectrum of AD, particularly neuronal death stemming from β-amyloid and tau pathologies. Furthermore, the success of these transgenic mice often relies on the overexpression of APP transgenes enclosing FAD-associated mutations at levels beyond physiological. Ultimate species-specific discrepancies in genome and protein composition between the human and the mouse may hinder the accurate recapitulation of AD pathological events in mouse models. Although none of the AD models fully mirrors human pathology, these experimental in vivo animal models have provided valuable insights into β-amyloid toxicity and the overall pathophysiological basis of AD. Therefore, these experimental models have been widely used in the preclinical evaluation of therapeutic strategies and have played a pivotal role in the development of immunotherapies for AD. In this review, we sum up the main transgenic mouse models used for AD research, whether they are APP mutation-based mice, APP plus presenilin mutation-based mice, or tau mutation-based mice. The specific characteristics of each mouse model and the significance of their use for AD research, focusing on their current advantages and disadvantages, as well as on the progress made and the forthcoming challenges in replicating this neurodegenerative disease, are also highlighted.

Journal of dementia and Alzheimer's diseaseVol. 2(1)
University of Lisbon (PT), University of Almería (ES)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
1.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.