A comprehensive evaluation of ai techniques for air quality index prediction: RNNs and transformers
This study evaluates the effectiveness of Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) and Transformer-based models in predicting the Air Quality Index (AQI). Accurate AQI prediction is critical for mitigating the significant health impacts of air pollution and plays a vital role in public health protection and environmental management. The research compares traditional RNN models, including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) networks, with advanced Transformer architectures. Data were collected from a weather station in Cuenca, Ecuador, focusing on key pollutants such as CO, NO2, O3, PM2.5, and SO2. Model performance was assessed using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and the Coefficient of Determination (R2). The findings reveal that the LSTM model achieved superior performance, with an R2 of 0.701, an RMSE of 0.087, and an MAE of 0.056, demonstrating superior capability in capturing temporal dependencies within complex datasets. Conversely, while Transformer-based models exhibited potential, they were less effective in handling intricate time-series data, resulting in comparatively lower accuracy. These results position the LSTM model as the most reliable approach for AQI prediction, offering an optimal balance between predictive accuracy and computational efficiency. This research contributes to improving AQI forecasting and underscores the importance of timely interventions to mitigate the harmful effects of air pollution.
Authors
- Álvaro Zamudio Lara
- Juan Pablo Pazmiño Piedra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0069-7680)
- Pablo-Andrés Buestán-Andrade (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9210-1591)
- Pedro Esteban Carrión Zamora
Institutions
- Universidad Católica de Cuenca (EC)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Ingenius
- Published
- 2025-01-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.17163/ings.n33.2025.06
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.60