Application of a quantitative uncertainty assessment to develop ranges of plausible toxicity values when using observational data in risk assessment: a case study examining associations between PFOA and PFOS exposures and vaccine response

Traditional approaches for quantitatively characterizing uncertainty in risk assessment require adaptation to accommodate increased reliance on observational (vs experimental) studies in developing toxicity values. Herein, a case study with perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and PFOS and vaccine response explores approaches for qualitative and-where possible-quantitative assessments of uncertainty at each step in the toxicity value development process when using observational data, including review and appraisal of individual studies, candidate study selection, dose-response modeling, and application of uncertainty factors. Each of the 15 studies identified had uncertainties due to risk of bias in confounding, outcome, and exposure ascertainment, likely contributing to the observed inconsistencies within and across studies, and resulting in lack of candidacy for dose-response assessment. Nonetheless, 2 representative studies were selected to demonstrate possible methods to quantify uncertainty in the remaining steps. Data simulations indicated lack of a clear dose-response relationship; dose-response models fit to representative simulations indicated high uncertainty in both the magnitude and direction of effect with simulated benchmark dose and its lower limit values varying at least 66- and 86-fold for PFOA and PFOS. Uncertainty factor application added minimal uncertainty. Combined, a high level of uncertainty was observed, precluding the ability to confidently assess causal dose-response relationships with the observational data, alone. This case study highlights the need for quantitative uncertainty analysis when developing toxicity values with observational data and, importantly, emphasizes the need for application of additional techniques to directly assess causality and the specificity of dose-response when relying on studies of association in quantitative risk assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Toxicological Sciences
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfae152
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of a quantitative uncertainty assessment to develop ranges of plausible toxicity values when using observational data in risk assessment: a case study examining associations between PFOA and PFOS exposures and vaccine response

William D. Klaren, Melissa Vincent, Susan T. Pastula, Melissa M. Heintz et al.
3 citations
Toxicological Sciences
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
3.60
article

Application of a quantitative uncertainty assessment to develop ranges of plausible toxicity values when using observational data in risk assessment: a case study examining associations between PFOA and PFOS exposures and vaccine response

William D. Klaren, Melissa Vincent, Susan T. Pastula, Melissa M. Heintz, Daniele Wikoff, Laurie C. Haws, Heidi Reichert
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Traditional approaches for quantitatively characterizing uncertainty in risk assessment require adaptation to accommodate increased reliance on observational (vs experimental) studies in developing toxicity values. Herein, a case study with perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and PFOS and vaccine response explores approaches for qualitative and-where possible-quantitative assessments of uncertainty at each step in the toxicity value development process when using observational data, including review and appraisal of individual studies, candidate study selection, dose-response modeling, and application of uncertainty factors. Each of the 15 studies identified had uncertainties due to risk of bias in confounding, outcome, and exposure ascertainment, likely contributing to the observed inconsistencies within and across studies, and resulting in lack of candidacy for dose-response assessment. Nonetheless, 2 representative studies were selected to demonstrate possible methods to quantify uncertainty in the remaining steps. Data simulations indicated lack of a clear dose-response relationship; dose-response models fit to representative simulations indicated high uncertainty in both the magnitude and direction of effect with simulated benchmark dose and its lower limit values varying at least 66- and 86-fold for PFOA and PFOS. Uncertainty factor application added minimal uncertainty. Combined, a high level of uncertainty was observed, precluding the ability to confidently assess causal dose-response relationships with the observational data, alone. This case study highlights the need for quantitative uncertainty analysis when developing toxicity values with observational data and, importantly, emphasizes the need for application of additional techniques to directly assess causality and the specificity of dose-response when relying on studies of association in quantitative risk assessment.

Toxicological SciencesVol. 204(1)
BioStrategies (United States) (US), ToxStrategies LLC (United States)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
3.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.