Antibiotic Resistance, Polycentricity, and the Regulation of Antibiotic Prescribing in the Primary Care Setting

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an urgent global challenge requiring an effective regulatory response, particularly regarding the governance of antibiotic prescribing. Dominant understandings of prescribing, however, are marked by a vision of the regulatory field with a strong ‘centre’—namely, the prescriber—whose actions are given a central role in directing the flow of events around AMR through a form of command-and-control rule. This insistence on a strong ‘centre’ and upon juridical forms of governance is de-centred in many contemporary conceptions of regulation. Drawing on data from interviews with patients who are enmeshed within AMR-related regulatory systems in the Australian primary care setting, this article argues that this regulatory field is polycentric in nature with signs that multiple regulatory actors influence prescribing and thus AMR-related outcomes. This polycentricity radically alters the capacity of individual actors to influence the flow of events around prescribing and indicates different regulatory approaches are required to realise objectives regarding AMR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laws
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14010005
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Antibiotic Resistance, Polycentricity, and the Regulation of Antibiotic Prescribing in the Primary Care Setting

David J. Carter
Laws
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

Antibiotic Resistance, Polycentricity, and the Regulation of Antibiotic Prescribing in the Primary Care Setting

David J. Carter
article en

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an urgent global challenge requiring an effective regulatory response, particularly regarding the governance of antibiotic prescribing. Dominant understandings of prescribing, however, are marked by a vision of the regulatory field with a strong ‘centre’—namely, the prescriber—whose actions are given a central role in directing the flow of events around AMR through a form of command-and-control rule. This insistence on a strong ‘centre’ and upon juridical forms of governance is de-centred in many contemporary conceptions of regulation. Drawing on data from interviews with patients who are enmeshed within AMR-related regulatory systems in the Australian primary care setting, this article argues that this regulatory field is polycentric in nature with signs that multiple regulatory actors influence prescribing and thus AMR-related outcomes. This polycentricity radically alters the capacity of individual actors to influence the flow of events around prescribing and indicates different regulatory approaches are required to realise objectives regarding AMR.

LawsVol. 14(1)
UNSW Sydney (AU)
National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Antibiotic Resistance, Polycentricity, and the Regulation of Antibiotic Prescribing in the Primary Care Setting — David J. Carter · Laws (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS