Exploring cooperative and competitive relations in a Chinese intercity innovation network

While the relevance of intercity networks for innovation has long been highlighted in the literature, how such interactions may constitute both competition and cooperation between cities is less researched. This paper compares potential intercity competitive and cooperative relations in co-patent activities between Chinese cities. The results point to different patterns of competition and cooperation, especially regarding differentiated relevance of city size, political hierarchies and (geographical) distance. Specifically, cities may be likely to have competitive relations with others at same administrative levels and with similar sizes. Distance decay is evident in potential intercity cooperation but not in competitive relations. This research not only compares competitive and cooperative intercity relations in innovation activities but also highlights policy implications. • Examine potential competitive and cooperative relations in an intercity innovation network. • Identify the relevance of city size, political hierarchy, and distance. • Reveal different hierarchical patterns in competitive and cooperative relations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Geography
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103508
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Economic and Technological Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring cooperative and competitive relations in a Chinese intercity innovation network

Yuxin Qian, Weiyang Zhang, Junwei Tang, Xingjian Liu
5 citations
Applied Geography
Economic and Technological Innovation
15.66
article

Exploring cooperative and competitive relations in a Chinese intercity innovation network

Yuxin Qian, Weiyang Zhang, Junwei Tang, Xingjian Liu
article en
5 citations

Abstract

While the relevance of intercity networks for innovation has long been highlighted in the literature, how such interactions may constitute both competition and cooperation between cities is less researched. This paper compares potential intercity competitive and cooperative relations in co-patent activities between Chinese cities. The results point to different patterns of competition and cooperation, especially regarding differentiated relevance of city size, political hierarchies and (geographical) distance. Specifically, cities may be likely to have competitive relations with others at same administrative levels and with similar sizes. Distance decay is evident in potential intercity cooperation but not in competitive relations. This research not only compares competitive and cooperative intercity relations in innovation activities but also highlights policy implications. • Examine potential competitive and cooperative relations in an intercity innovation network. • Identify the relevance of city size, political hierarchy, and distance. • Reveal different hierarchical patterns in competitive and cooperative relations.

Applied GeographyVol. 175
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen Research Institute (CN), European Corporate Governance Institute (BE), East China Normal University (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK), KU Leuven (BE)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Economic and Technological Innovation
15.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.