Carbon Credits Through Wood Use: Revisiting the Maximum Potential and Sensitivity to Key Assumptions

ABSTRACT Wood use generates technosphere carbon credits (TCCs) through avoided fossil‐based emissions and net sequestration of carbon into the technosphere (harvested wood products and geological storage). We investigated how large and uncertain TCCs of wood use per carbon harvested are considering the current and alternative ways of using wood, and the effects of the decarbonization of societies over 25‐, 50‐, and 100‐year time horizons. We applied stochastic simulation and scenario analysis using Finnish market structure as a baseline to demonstrate the use of the TCC calculator created. The mean value of TCCs of wood use were between 0.2 and 0.5 t C /t C with an uncertainty range from 0.1 to 0.8 t C /t C , depending on the scenario. The uncertainties were mainly concerned with the extent to which (1) fossil‐based emissions are avoided through substitution (displacement factors) and (2) fossil‐based raw materials are substituted (substitution rates). Assumptions on the decarbonization of societies reduced TCCs of wood use significantly over time. TCCs of wood use can be increased by directing wood into uses that substitute fossil‐intensive materials and have a long lifetime, such as construction materials, and increasing energy recovery and avoiding emitting carbon at the end of life of harvested wood products by carbon capture and storage. However, they were very likely to be considerably lower than forest carbon debits resulting from harvesting additional wood for substitution under all considered circumstances and under a wide but reasonable range of stochastic parameter values. Thus, the result emphasizes the need to reduce overall consumption of goods to mitigate climate change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GCB Bioenergy
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70017
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon Credits Through Wood Use: Revisiting the Maximum Potential and Sensitivity to Key Assumptions

Tord Snäll, Sampo Soimakallio, Elias Hurmekoski, Janni Kunttu et al.
7 citations
GCB Bioenergy
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
5.59
article

Carbon Credits Through Wood Use: Revisiting the Maximum Potential and Sensitivity to Key Assumptions

Tord Snäll, Sampo Soimakallio, Elias Hurmekoski, Janni Kunttu, Federico Lingua, Jari Niemi, Tanja Myllyviita
article en
7 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Wood use generates technosphere carbon credits (TCCs) through avoided fossil‐based emissions and net sequestration of carbon into the technosphere (harvested wood products and geological storage). We investigated how large and uncertain TCCs of wood use per carbon harvested are considering the current and alternative ways of using wood, and the effects of the decarbonization of societies over 25‐, 50‐, and 100‐year time horizons. We applied stochastic simulation and scenario analysis using Finnish market structure as a baseline to demonstrate the use of the TCC calculator created. The mean value of TCCs of wood use were between 0.2 and 0.5 t C /t C with an uncertainty range from 0.1 to 0.8 t C /t C , depending on the scenario. The uncertainties were mainly concerned with the extent to which (1) fossil‐based emissions are avoided through substitution (displacement factors) and (2) fossil‐based raw materials are substituted (substitution rates). Assumptions on the decarbonization of societies reduced TCCs of wood use significantly over time. TCCs of wood use can be increased by directing wood into uses that substitute fossil‐intensive materials and have a long lifetime, such as construction materials, and increasing energy recovery and avoiding emitting carbon at the end of life of harvested wood products by carbon capture and storage. However, they were very likely to be considerably lower than forest carbon debits resulting from harvesting additional wood for substitution under all considered circumstances and under a wide but reasonable range of stochastic parameter values. Thus, the result emphasizes the need to reduce overall consumption of goods to mitigate climate change.

GCB BioenergyVol. 17(2)
University of Helsinki (FI), Finnish Environment Institute (FI), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Swedish Species Information Centre (SE)
European Commission, Academy of Finland, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
5.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.