Diet and landscape controls on greenhouse gas emissions from cattle excreta in a semi-arid environment

Sod-seeding low productivity, or depleted, pastures with legumes, and non-bloat legumes in particular, is considered a viable method of restoring productivity to the pasture. However, the impact of the change in plant composition of the pastures on GHG emissions from the urine and dung deposited by cattle grazing the pastures is as yet unknown. Excreta were collected from beef cattle grazing a low productivity, depleted meadow bromegrass-alfalfa mixed pasture (D-MA) and D-MA pastures rejuvenated by sod-seeding with a non-bloat legume, cicer milkvetch (R-CM) or sainfoin (R-SF). The excreta were subsequently applied back to the respective pastures at locations in upper and lower slope positions. In general, plant composition of the pastures had a small but significant impact on the C and N content of the cattle excreta; however, this yielded no significant differences among treatments in either cumulative CO 2 emissions or cumulative CH 4 uptake for either the urine or dung. Yet, whereas CH 4 uptake was unaffected by the application of either urine or dung, urine applications yielded CO 2 emissions that were greater than those from the control or dung-amended treatments. Nitrous oxide emissions were significantly impacted by the chemical composition of the urine, and here we report distinct N 2 O emission factors for urine and dung—with an average EF N2O of 0.034 ± 0.024 % for dung and 0.12 ± 0.10 % for the urine from cattle that grazed the depleted and rejuvenated pastures. Our data also suggest that, for urine at least, diet can significantly impact the EF N2O , with urine from cattle grazing the R-CM pasture yielding an EF N2O of 0.24 ± 0.10 % and urine from confined beef cattle fed a high crude protein, total mixed ration (TMR) diet yielding an EF N2O of 0.39 ± 0.13 %. These findings suggest that a disaggregation of emission factors based on excreta type and animal diet, while also considering temporal (seasonal) and spatial (landscape-scale) variability, can lead to improved accuracy of GHG emissions inventories. • Landscape position is an important regulator of excreta patch GHG emissions. • The composition of urine and dung deposited by beef cattle is related to the grazing diet. • Urine patch N 2 O emissions are diet-related and depend on more than just N concentration of the urine. • Nitrous oxide emission factors (EF N2O ) for beef cattle urine and dung were 0.19 % and 0.034 %, respectively. • The EF N2O for beef cattle urine and dung should be disaggregated for pastures in the semi-arid Canadian Prairies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.109469
Primary Topic
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diet and landscape controls on greenhouse gas emissions from cattle excreta in a semi-arid environment

R. Farrell, Jun Liu, Helen Margaret Baulch, J. Diane Knight et al.
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
article

Diet and landscape controls on greenhouse gas emissions from cattle excreta in a semi-arid environment

R. Farrell, Jun Liu, Helen Margaret Baulch, J. Diane Knight, Reynald Lemke
article en

Abstract

Sod-seeding low productivity, or depleted, pastures with legumes, and non-bloat legumes in particular, is considered a viable method of restoring productivity to the pasture. However, the impact of the change in plant composition of the pastures on GHG emissions from the urine and dung deposited by cattle grazing the pastures is as yet unknown. Excreta were collected from beef cattle grazing a low productivity, depleted meadow bromegrass-alfalfa mixed pasture (D-MA) and D-MA pastures rejuvenated by sod-seeding with a non-bloat legume, cicer milkvetch (R-CM) or sainfoin (R-SF). The excreta were subsequently applied back to the respective pastures at locations in upper and lower slope positions. In general, plant composition of the pastures had a small but significant impact on the C and N content of the cattle excreta; however, this yielded no significant differences among treatments in either cumulative CO 2 emissions or cumulative CH 4 uptake for either the urine or dung. Yet, whereas CH 4 uptake was unaffected by the application of either urine or dung, urine applications yielded CO 2 emissions that were greater than those from the control or dung-amended treatments. Nitrous oxide emissions were significantly impacted by the chemical composition of the urine, and here we report distinct N 2 O emission factors for urine and dung—with an average EF N2O of 0.034 ± 0.024 % for dung and 0.12 ± 0.10 % for the urine from cattle that grazed the depleted and rejuvenated pastures. Our data also suggest that, for urine at least, diet can significantly impact the EF N2O , with urine from cattle grazing the R-CM pasture yielding an EF N2O of 0.24 ± 0.10 % and urine from confined beef cattle fed a high crude protein, total mixed ration (TMR) diet yielding an EF N2O of 0.39 ± 0.13 %. These findings suggest that a disaggregation of emission factors based on excreta type and animal diet, while also considering temporal (seasonal) and spatial (landscape-scale) variability, can lead to improved accuracy of GHG emissions inventories. • Landscape position is an important regulator of excreta patch GHG emissions. • The composition of urine and dung deposited by beef cattle is related to the grazing diet. • Urine patch N 2 O emissions are diet-related and depend on more than just N concentration of the urine. • Nitrous oxide emission factors (EF N2O ) for beef cattle urine and dung were 0.19 % and 0.034 %, respectively. • The EF N2O for beef cattle urine and dung should be disaggregated for pastures in the semi-arid Canadian Prairies.

Agriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentVol. 382
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.