The impact of lower thoracic versus upper lumbar upper instrumented vertebra in minimally invasive correction of adult spinal deformity

Selecting a UL vertebra for UIV in minimally invasive surgical correction of adult spinal deformity results in lower reoperation rates compared to extending fixation to the LT region. This choice also correlates with shorter operating room times and reduced estimated blood loss. Although extending fixation to the LT region is associated with slightly greater lumbar lordosis and a greater change in the coronal Cobb angle, clinical outcomes were similar between the LT and UL groups for UIV.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurosurgery Spine
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.spine231335
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of lower thoracic versus upper lumbar upper instrumented vertebra in minimally invasive correction of adult spinal deformity

Adam S. Kanter, Pierce D. Nunley, Paul Park, David O. Okonkwo et al.
Journal of Neurosurgery Spine
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
article

The impact of lower thoracic versus upper lumbar upper instrumented vertebra in minimally invasive correction of adult spinal deformity

Adam S. Kanter, Pierce D. Nunley, Paul Park, David O. Okonkwo, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Juan S. Uribe, Khoi D. Than, Gregory M. Mundis, Richard G. Fessler, Neel Anand, Dean Chou, Stacie Tran, Kai-Ming Fu, Michael Y. Wang, Jay I. Kumar, Robert K. Eastlack
article en

Abstract

Selecting a UL vertebra for UIV in minimally invasive surgical correction of adult spinal deformity results in lower reoperation rates compared to extending fixation to the LT region. This choice also correlates with shorter operating room times and reduced estimated blood loss. Although extending fixation to the LT region is associated with slightly greater lumbar lordosis and a greater change in the coronal Cobb angle, clinical outcomes were similar between the LT and UL groups for UIV.

Journal of Neurosurgery SpineVol. 42(4)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Barrow Neurological Institute (US), University of Miami (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Neurosciences Institute (US), Cornell University (US), University of South Florida (US), Spine Institute of Louisiana (US), Semmes Murphey Foundation (US), Duke Medical Center (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), San Diego Spine Institute (US), Scripps Clinic (US), Duke University Hospital (US), Neurological Surgery (US), Rush University (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The impact of lower thoracic versus upper lumbar upper instrumented vertebra in minimally invasive correction of adult spinal deformity — Adam S. Kanter, Pierce D. Nunley, et al. · Journal of Neurosurgery Spine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS