Structural and policy overview of medical education in Germany
Abstract The current study provides a comprehensive analysis of the management and policy framework governing medical education in Germany, with a focus on aligning training programs with evolving societal needs and regulatory standards. Key areas of emphasis include medical training, admissions processes, residency programs, and continuing medical education, reflecting the dynamic interplay between technological advancements, policy reforms, and the demands of modern healthcare systems. Additionally, this study critically examines the structure, effectiveness, and inclusivity of Germany’s medical education programs, particularly their capacity to equip future healthcare professionals with the skills necessary to navigate the complexities of contemporary healthcare. The analysis highlights the importance of equitable admission and residency selection criteria in fostering diversity within the medical workforce, alongside the role of ongoing professional development in enhancing healthcare quality. Recommendations are proposed to refine curricula, integrate interdisciplinary approaches, and incorporate contemporary medical practices, ensuring that medical education remains responsive to current and future healthcare challenges. Our study offers valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of Germany’s medical education system, providing evidence-based policy suggestions for stakeholders committed to advancing educational outcomes and optimizing healthcare delivery.
Authors
- Yaqian Xu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1247-7239)
- Ying Hao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3291-2755)
- Tiancheng Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2580-5935)
- Xiangwei Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9450-7771)
Institutions
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Global Medical Education
- Published
- 2025-01-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1515/gme-2024-0016
- Primary Topic
- Health and Medical Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China