Hybrid intelligence for the public sector: A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence and crowd intelligence

With the increasing attention paid to artificial intelligence (AI) and crowd intelligence (CI) in government, their connections still need to be explored. This study explores the dynamic relationship between AI and CI that constitutes hybrid intelligence for the public sector. Thus, we adopt a bibliometric analysis to identify trends, emerging themes, topics, and interconnections between these two streams of literature. Our review illustrates the intersection between AI and CI, revealing that AI designs can improve efficiency from CI inputs. Meanwhile, AI advancement depends on the quality of CI data. Furthermore, our review highlights key domains such as smart cities (Internet of Things), personnel design, social media, and governance through cases. Based on these illustrated cases, we conceptualize a hybrid intelligence spectrum, ranging from “engagement” to “efficiency,” with crowd intelligence anchoring the former through its emphasis on public participation and AI anchoring the latter through its focus on automation and optimization. Hybrid intelligence, encompassing various forms, occupies the middle ground to balance maximizing public engagement and achieving computational efficiency. Additionally, we elaborate on components of hybrid intelligence designs regarding input (conscious crowds and unconscious crowds), process (algorithmic management and artificial discretion), and outcome (user-focus benefits and non-user-focus outputs). Finally, we recommend prioritizing questions related to the design, regulation, and governance of hybrid intelligence for the public sector. • Bibliometric analysis reveals applications of hybrid intelligence in smart cities, personnel design, social media, governance. • Our review conceptualizes a hybrid intelligence spectrum, including CI, augmented CI, human-centered AI, and AI. • Hybrid intelligence (HI) balances CI by emphasizing participation and AI by prioritizing automation and optimization. • HI component includes an input (conscious vs. unconscious crowds), process (algorithmic management vs. artificial discretion), outcomes (user- vs. non-user-focus outputs).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Government Information Quarterly
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.102006
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid intelligence for the public sector: A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence and crowd intelligence

Helen K. Liu, Anne-Sophie Collard, Muh‐Chyun Tang
11 citations
Government Information Quarterly
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
26.02
article

Hybrid intelligence for the public sector: A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence and crowd intelligence

Helen K. Liu, Anne-Sophie Collard, Muh‐Chyun Tang
article en
11 citations

Abstract

With the increasing attention paid to artificial intelligence (AI) and crowd intelligence (CI) in government, their connections still need to be explored. This study explores the dynamic relationship between AI and CI that constitutes hybrid intelligence for the public sector. Thus, we adopt a bibliometric analysis to identify trends, emerging themes, topics, and interconnections between these two streams of literature. Our review illustrates the intersection between AI and CI, revealing that AI designs can improve efficiency from CI inputs. Meanwhile, AI advancement depends on the quality of CI data. Furthermore, our review highlights key domains such as smart cities (Internet of Things), personnel design, social media, and governance through cases. Based on these illustrated cases, we conceptualize a hybrid intelligence spectrum, ranging from “engagement” to “efficiency,” with crowd intelligence anchoring the former through its emphasis on public participation and AI anchoring the latter through its focus on automation and optimization. Hybrid intelligence, encompassing various forms, occupies the middle ground to balance maximizing public engagement and achieving computational efficiency. Additionally, we elaborate on components of hybrid intelligence designs regarding input (conscious crowds and unconscious crowds), process (algorithmic management and artificial discretion), and outcome (user-focus benefits and non-user-focus outputs). Finally, we recommend prioritizing questions related to the design, regulation, and governance of hybrid intelligence for the public sector. • Bibliometric analysis reveals applications of hybrid intelligence in smart cities, personnel design, social media, governance. • Our review conceptualizes a hybrid intelligence spectrum, including CI, augmented CI, human-centered AI, and AI. • Hybrid intelligence (HI) balances CI by emphasizing participation and AI by prioritizing automation and optimization. • HI component includes an input (conscious vs. unconscious crowds), process (algorithmic management vs. artificial discretion), outcomes (user- vs. non-user-focus outputs).

Government Information QuarterlyVol. 42(1)
National Taiwan University (TW), European CanCer Organisation (BE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
26.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.