Preference eigensystems for fair ranking

The problem of fair decision had been studied within information systems for a long time. In the event of Information Retrieval and Recommendation, the need of accessing information by means of rankings complicates the search for fairness because the exposure of an item depends on the user’s attention and on the rank of the item. Starting from the observation that a ranking is the result of a series of preferences based on a variety of criteria, this paper describes Preference Fair Ranking (PFR). In a nutshell, matrices are defined containing the preferences between items according to different criteria and the eigenvectors of a linear combination of the matrices that establish the best ranking are found. The paper also reports on the experiments carried out by using two large public test collections for fair information retrieval, i.e. 2021 and 2022 TREC Fair tracks and by comparing the proposed method with two well-known fair ranking algorithms. The results show that the proposed method significantly outperform the other two methods. In particular, PFR showed to be superior in fairness to the baseline methods in terms of the TREC Fair track measures. Besides retrieval effectiveness and fairness, PFR is computationally efficient and helps the flexible design of multiple criteria ranking. • A matrix encodes item preferences according to one criterion. • A linear combination of matrices models multiple preference criteria. • The principal eigenvector provides the unique effective fair ranking. • The experiments confirm effectiveness and efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Systems with Applications
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.126324
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preference eigensystems for fair ranking

Massimo Melucci
2 citations
Expert Systems with Applications
Game Theory and Voting Systems
6.26
article

Preference eigensystems for fair ranking

Massimo Melucci
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The problem of fair decision had been studied within information systems for a long time. In the event of Information Retrieval and Recommendation, the need of accessing information by means of rankings complicates the search for fairness because the exposure of an item depends on the user’s attention and on the rank of the item. Starting from the observation that a ranking is the result of a series of preferences based on a variety of criteria, this paper describes Preference Fair Ranking (PFR). In a nutshell, matrices are defined containing the preferences between items according to different criteria and the eigenvectors of a linear combination of the matrices that establish the best ranking are found. The paper also reports on the experiments carried out by using two large public test collections for fair information retrieval, i.e. 2021 and 2022 TREC Fair tracks and by comparing the proposed method with two well-known fair ranking algorithms. The results show that the proposed method significantly outperform the other two methods. In particular, PFR showed to be superior in fairness to the baseline methods in terms of the TREC Fair track measures. Besides retrieval effectiveness and fairness, PFR is computationally efficient and helps the flexible design of multiple criteria ranking. • A matrix encodes item preferences according to one criterion. • A linear combination of matrices models multiple preference criteria. • The principal eigenvector provides the unique effective fair ranking. • The experiments confirm effectiveness and efficiency.

Expert Systems with ApplicationsVol. 269
University of Padua (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Preference eigensystems for fair ranking — Massimo Melucci · Expert Systems with Applications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS