Development of the protective factors Survey, military families (PFS-MF)

Many family service organizations offer services targeted to the needs of families with one or both parents serving in a branch of the armed forces. To support these organizations, we adapted the Protective Factors Survey, 2nd Edition (PFS-2) to capture experiences of military family life and establish the new survey’s reliability and validity. We conducted focus groups with military family members, consulted with experts in field, and reviewed existing research to develop new items. We fielded an online survey with a convenience sample of military family members and civilian caregivers to collect data on new and existing PFS-2 items, which we analyzed for performance with military families compared to civilians, and psychometric characteristics. Our analysis confirmed that original PFS-2 items worked well for military families, and there was not a significant difference between how military and non-military respondents responded to these items. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a 5-factor structure, representing protective factor constructs of nurturing and attachment, social support, concrete support, military family life and resilience, and a fifth construct related to program evaluation. The Protective Factors Survey, Military Families (PFS-MF) possesses sound psychometric properties measuring protective factors which support family resilience and reduce the probability of child maltreatment. The PFS-MF fills a gap as a short, free, flexible survey that measures multiple protective factors as they relate to the military experience. It can be used as an evaluation tool to measure program effectiveness, inform needs assessments, make programmatic decisions, and tailor individual services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children and Youth Services Review
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108131
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of the protective factors Survey, military families (PFS-MF)

Jessica Sprague‐Jones, Kirstie L. Bash, Casandra Firman, Yve Susskind et al.
1 citations
Children and Youth Services Review
Resilience and Mental Health
2.31
article

Development of the protective factors Survey, military families (PFS-MF)

Jessica Sprague‐Jones, Kirstie L. Bash, Casandra Firman, Yve Susskind, Kimberly McKenney
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Many family service organizations offer services targeted to the needs of families with one or both parents serving in a branch of the armed forces. To support these organizations, we adapted the Protective Factors Survey, 2nd Edition (PFS-2) to capture experiences of military family life and establish the new survey’s reliability and validity. We conducted focus groups with military family members, consulted with experts in field, and reviewed existing research to develop new items. We fielded an online survey with a convenience sample of military family members and civilian caregivers to collect data on new and existing PFS-2 items, which we analyzed for performance with military families compared to civilians, and psychometric characteristics. Our analysis confirmed that original PFS-2 items worked well for military families, and there was not a significant difference between how military and non-military respondents responded to these items. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a 5-factor structure, representing protective factor constructs of nurturing and attachment, social support, concrete support, military family life and resilience, and a fifth construct related to program evaluation. The Protective Factors Survey, Military Families (PFS-MF) possesses sound psychometric properties measuring protective factors which support family resilience and reduce the probability of child maltreatment. The PFS-MF fills a gap as a short, free, flexible survey that measures multiple protective factors as they relate to the military experience. It can be used as an evaluation tool to measure program effectiveness, inform needs assessments, make programmatic decisions, and tailor individual services.

Children and Youth Services ReviewVol. 169
University of Kansas (US), Prevent Child Abuse America (US), University of Nebraska Medical Center (US), Pacific Lutheran University (US), Praxis (EE)
Institute of Museum and Library Services
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Resilience and Mental Health
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.