High variability in the reproducibility of key hemodynamic responses to head-up tilt

Increased blood pressure upon standing is considered a cardiovascular risk factor. We investigated the reproducibility of changes in aortic blood pressure, heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output, and systemic vascular resistance during three passive head-up tilts (HUT) in 223 participants without cardiovascular medications (mean age 46 yr, BMI 28 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 54% male). The median time gap between the first and the second HUT was 9 wk and the second and the third HUT was 4 wk. We utilized whole body impedance cardiography and radial artery tonometry as methods. The participants were divided into quartiles of the changes in each hemodynamic variable during the first HUT, and the reproducibility of these changes was tested during successive HUTs. During the first HUT, significant differences were present in all between-quartile comparisons (<i>n</i> = 6) of all variables. The differences persisted as follows: reduction of stroke volume in six out of six (6/6) between-quartile comparisons (<i>P</i> < 0.001), decrease in cardiac output (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and increase in heart rate in 5/6 comparisons (<i>P</i> < 0.001), change in systemic vascular resistance in 3/6 comparisons (<i>P</i> < 0.001), change in aortic systolic blood pressure in 1/6 comparisons (<i>P</i> = 0.043), and change in aortic diastolic blood pressure in none (<i>P</i> = 0.266). To conclude, the reproducibility of upright posture-induced changes is high for stroke volume, cardiac output, and heart rate, moderate for systemic vascular resistance, and modest for aortic blood pressure. Although an increase in blood pressure during upright posture may be a cardiovascular risk factor, this effect may be attributed to other underlying hemodynamic variables that exhibit more reproducible posture-related changes.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> We examined the reproducibility of hemodynamic responses to three passive head-up tilts. The associated changes in stroke volume, cardiac output, and heart rate were highly reproducible. Systemic vascular resistance showed moderate reproducibility, whereas blood pressure changes during upright posture were modestly reproducible. If an exaggerated blood pressure response to upright posture is a cardiovascular risk factor, it is likely attributed to other hemodynamic variables that exhibit more reproducible posture-related changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00796.2024
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High variability in the reproducibility of key hemodynamic responses to head-up tilt

Jenni Koskela, Ilkka Pörsti, Lauri Suojanen, Manoj Kumar Choudhary et al.
1 citations
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
2.38
article

High variability in the reproducibility of key hemodynamic responses to head-up tilt

Jenni Koskela, Ilkka Pörsti, Lauri Suojanen, Manoj Kumar Choudhary, Heidi Bouquin, Jukka Mustonen, Essi Pietilä
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Increased blood pressure upon standing is considered a cardiovascular risk factor. We investigated the reproducibility of changes in aortic blood pressure, heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output, and systemic vascular resistance during three passive head-up tilts (HUT) in 223 participants without cardiovascular medications (mean age 46 yr, BMI 28 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 54% male). The median time gap between the first and the second HUT was 9 wk and the second and the third HUT was 4 wk. We utilized whole body impedance cardiography and radial artery tonometry as methods. The participants were divided into quartiles of the changes in each hemodynamic variable during the first HUT, and the reproducibility of these changes was tested during successive HUTs. During the first HUT, significant differences were present in all between-quartile comparisons (<i>n</i> = 6) of all variables. The differences persisted as follows: reduction of stroke volume in six out of six (6/6) between-quartile comparisons (<i>P</i> < 0.001), decrease in cardiac output (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and increase in heart rate in 5/6 comparisons (<i>P</i> < 0.001), change in systemic vascular resistance in 3/6 comparisons (<i>P</i> < 0.001), change in aortic systolic blood pressure in 1/6 comparisons (<i>P</i> = 0.043), and change in aortic diastolic blood pressure in none (<i>P</i> = 0.266). To conclude, the reproducibility of upright posture-induced changes is high for stroke volume, cardiac output, and heart rate, moderate for systemic vascular resistance, and modest for aortic blood pressure. Although an increase in blood pressure during upright posture may be a cardiovascular risk factor, this effect may be attributed to other underlying hemodynamic variables that exhibit more reproducible posture-related changes.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> We examined the reproducibility of hemodynamic responses to three passive head-up tilts. The associated changes in stroke volume, cardiac output, and heart rate were highly reproducible. Systemic vascular resistance showed moderate reproducibility, whereas blood pressure changes during upright posture were modestly reproducible. If an exaggerated blood pressure response to upright posture is a cardiovascular risk factor, it is likely attributed to other hemodynamic variables that exhibit more reproducible posture-related changes.

American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologyVol. 328(3)
Tampere University (FI), Tampere University Hospital (FI), Tampere University (FI)
Suomen Lääketieteen Säätiö, Päivikki ja Sakari Sohlbergin Säätiö, Paavo Nurmen Säätiö
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
2.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.