Utilising affordable smartphones and open-source time-lapse photography for pollinator image collection and annotation

Monitoring plant-pollinator interactions is crucial for understanding the factors influencing these relationships across space and time. Traditional methods in pollination ecology are resource-intensive, while time-lapse photography offers potential for non-destructive and automated complementary techniques. However, accurate identification of pollinators at finer taxonomic levels (i.e., genus or species) requires high enough image quality. This study assessed the feasibility of using a smartphone setup to capture time-lapse images of arthropods visiting flowers and evaluated whether these images offered sufficient resolution for arthropod identification by taxonomists. Smartphones were positioned above target flowers from various plant species in urban green areas around Leipzig and Halle, Germany. We present proportions of arthropod identifications (instances) at different taxonomic levels (order, family, genus, species) based on visible features in the images as interpreted by taxonomists. We document whether limitations stem from the automated setup (e.g., fixed positioning preventing capture of distinguishing features despite high image resolution) or from low image quality. Recommendations are provided to address these challenges. Our results indicate that 89.81% of all Hymenoptera instances were identified to family level, 84.56% of pollinator family instances to genus level, and only 25.35% to species level. We were less able to identify Dipterans to finer taxonomic levels, with nearly 50% of instances not identifiable to family level, and only 26.18% and 15.19% identified to genus and species levels. This was due to their small size and the more challenging features needed for identification (e.g., in the wing veins). Advancing smartphone technology, along with their accessibility, affordability, and user-friendliness, offers a promising option for coarse-level pollinator monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pollination Ecology
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2025)778
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utilising affordable smartphones and open-source time-lapse photography for pollinator image collection and annotation

Valentin Ştefan, Tiffany M. Knight, Demetra Rákosy, Aspen Workman et al.
5 citations
Journal of Pollination Ecology
Plant and animal studies
15.13
article

Utilising affordable smartphones and open-source time-lapse photography for pollinator image collection and annotation

Valentin Ştefan, Tiffany M. Knight, Demetra Rákosy, Aspen Workman, Jared C. Cobain
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Monitoring plant-pollinator interactions is crucial for understanding the factors influencing these relationships across space and time. Traditional methods in pollination ecology are resource-intensive, while time-lapse photography offers potential for non-destructive and automated complementary techniques. However, accurate identification of pollinators at finer taxonomic levels (i.e., genus or species) requires high enough image quality. This study assessed the feasibility of using a smartphone setup to capture time-lapse images of arthropods visiting flowers and evaluated whether these images offered sufficient resolution for arthropod identification by taxonomists. Smartphones were positioned above target flowers from various plant species in urban green areas around Leipzig and Halle, Germany. We present proportions of arthropod identifications (instances) at different taxonomic levels (order, family, genus, species) based on visible features in the images as interpreted by taxonomists. We document whether limitations stem from the automated setup (e.g., fixed positioning preventing capture of distinguishing features despite high image resolution) or from low image quality. Recommendations are provided to address these challenges. Our results indicate that 89.81% of all Hymenoptera instances were identified to family level, 84.56% of pollinator family instances to genus level, and only 25.35% to species level. We were less able to identify Dipterans to finer taxonomic levels, with nearly 50% of instances not identifiable to family level, and only 26.18% and 15.19% identified to genus and species levels. This was due to their small size and the more challenging features needed for identification (e.g., in the wing veins). Advancing smartphone technology, along with their accessibility, affordability, and user-friendliness, offers a promising option for coarse-level pollinator monitoring.

Journal of Pollination EcologyVol. 38
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Helmholtz Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Unit
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Plant and animal studies
15.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.