Critical evaluation of feature importance assessment in FFNN-based models for predicting Kamlet-Taft parameters

Mohan et al. developed a feed-forward neural network (FFNN) model to predict Kamlet-Taft parameters using quantum chemically derived features, achieving notable predictive accuracy. However, this study raises concerns about conflating prediction accuracy with feature importance accuracy, as high R 2 and low RMSE do not guarantee valid feature importance assessments. The reliance on SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) for feature evaluation is problematic due to model-specific biases that could misrepresent true associations. A broader understanding of data distribution, statistical relationships, and significance testing through p-values is essential to rectify this. This paper advocates for employing robust statistical methods, like Spearman’s correlation, to effectively assess genuine associations and mitigate biases in feature importance analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Green Chemical Engineering
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gce.2025.01.003
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical evaluation of feature importance assessment in FFNN-based models for predicting Kamlet-Taft parameters

Yoshiyasu Takefuji
2 citations
Green Chemical Engineering
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
2.48
article

Critical evaluation of feature importance assessment in FFNN-based models for predicting Kamlet-Taft parameters

Yoshiyasu Takefuji
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Mohan et al. developed a feed-forward neural network (FFNN) model to predict Kamlet-Taft parameters using quantum chemically derived features, achieving notable predictive accuracy. However, this study raises concerns about conflating prediction accuracy with feature importance accuracy, as high R 2 and low RMSE do not guarantee valid feature importance assessments. The reliance on SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) for feature evaluation is problematic due to model-specific biases that could misrepresent true associations. A broader understanding of data distribution, statistical relationships, and significance testing through p-values is essential to rectify this. This paper advocates for employing robust statistical methods, like Spearman’s correlation, to effectively assess genuine associations and mitigate biases in feature importance analysis.

Green Chemical EngineeringVol. 6(3)
Musashino University (JP)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.