Opposition control in compressible turbulent flows

Opposition control using out-of-phase, combined spanwise and wall-normal velocities at the walls has been studied. The control aims to establish a virtual wall away from the boundary wall, restricting and hindering momentum transport in respective directions. The study is carried out for flow regimes at bulk Mach numbers Mab = 0.8, 1.5, and 2.5, for bulk Reynolds number Reb = 3000. The combined velocity control achieves higher skin friction drag than the solitary wall-normal velocity control. The control application achieves a high drag reduction of over 30% for Mab = 0.8 and 1.5. However, for Mab = 2.5, the drag reduction tapers, signifying the loss of control effectiveness for higher Mab flows. At higher Mab number flows, the turbulent contribution to skin friction decreases significantly while the fixed laminar component increases. The quadrant analysis reveals an overall increase in the sweep events for Mab = 2.5 cases—the increase in sweep results from the channel's mean temperature profile. The high-temperature fluid in the channel core leads to the higher viscosity of the fluid as compared to the lower-viscosity near-wall fluid and assists sweeps toward the walls.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0251841
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opposition control in compressible turbulent flows

Syed Fahad Anwer, M. F. Baig, Moghees Ahmad
1 citations
Physics of Fluids
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
1.33
article

Opposition control in compressible turbulent flows

Syed Fahad Anwer, M. F. Baig, Moghees Ahmad
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Opposition control using out-of-phase, combined spanwise and wall-normal velocities at the walls has been studied. The control aims to establish a virtual wall away from the boundary wall, restricting and hindering momentum transport in respective directions. The study is carried out for flow regimes at bulk Mach numbers Mab = 0.8, 1.5, and 2.5, for bulk Reynolds number Reb = 3000. The combined velocity control achieves higher skin friction drag than the solitary wall-normal velocity control. The control application achieves a high drag reduction of over 30% for Mab = 0.8 and 1.5. However, for Mab = 2.5, the drag reduction tapers, signifying the loss of control effectiveness for higher Mab flows. At higher Mab number flows, the turbulent contribution to skin friction decreases significantly while the fixed laminar component increases. The quadrant analysis reveals an overall increase in the sweep events for Mab = 2.5 cases—the increase in sweep results from the channel's mean temperature profile. The high-temperature fluid in the channel core leads to the higher viscosity of the fluid as compared to the lower-viscosity near-wall fluid and assists sweeps toward the walls.

Physics of FluidsVol. 37(1)
Aligarh Muslim University (IN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.