Estimating Potential Eligibility for Disease Modifying Therapies for Alzheimer’s Disease Using Population‐Based Data in Alberta, Canada

Abstract Background Disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have been approved in some countries although these treatments will require substantial health resources for their implementation. Initial capacity planning to identify the resources required to support DMTs begins with estimating the number of people with dementia who may be eligible for DMTs. We estimated the potential number of individuals with dementia who are eligible for DMTs using population‐based data in Alberta, Canada. Method We used provincial administrative health databases in Alberta, Canada (population ∼4.5 million) to identify all people newly identified with dementia between April 1, 2013 and March 31, 2022 using a validated dementia case ascertainment algorithm. The characteristics of this population were then described at the time of diagnosis including demographics, conditions potentially contributing to the diagnosis of dementia (e.g. stroke, parkinsonism), and medical contraindications to treatment (e.g. cancer, seizures). The characteristics of individuals with dementia were then compared to the inclusion criteria used in AD DMT trials to estimate the proportion of individuals with dementia who may be eligible for DMTs. We then compared the characteristics of individuals who were determined to be eligible for DMTs compared to those who were not eligible. Result A total of 77,479 individuals were identified with incident dementia during the study period with a mean age of 80.6 years and 58% were female. In this group, 15,044/77,479 (19%) had conditions other than AD as a potential cause of their dementia. Medical contraindications to DMTs were present in 24,580/62,435 (39%) of all individuals who had AD as their probable cause of dementia. Overall, 37,855/77,479 (49%) of the entire dementia population could potentially go on to receive biomarker testing to determine DMT eligibility. Individuals who were younger and women were more likely to be potentially eligible for DMTs at the time of dementia diagnosis. Conclusion Approximately half of all people diagnosed with dementia in Alberta could be eligible for DMTs based on their health history. Additional information on cognitive test scores, neuroimaging, and biomarker results are required to further refine estimates of the number of individuals potentially eligible to receive DMTs in Canada.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.085900
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating Potential Eligibility for Disease Modifying Therapies for Alzheimer’s Disease Using Population‐Based Data in Alberta, Canada

Pamela Roach, Zahinoor Ismail, Vivian Ewa, Dallas Seitz et al.
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
0.71
article

Estimating Potential Eligibility for Disease Modifying Therapies for Alzheimer’s Disease Using Population‐Based Data in Alberta, Canada

Pamela Roach, Zahinoor Ismail, Vivian Ewa, Dallas Seitz, Eric Edward Smith, Andrea Gruneir, Gavin Thomas, Isabelle Vedel, Mohammad Chowdhury, Susan E. Bronskill, Zahra Goodarzi, Julia Kirkham
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have been approved in some countries although these treatments will require substantial health resources for their implementation. Initial capacity planning to identify the resources required to support DMTs begins with estimating the number of people with dementia who may be eligible for DMTs. We estimated the potential number of individuals with dementia who are eligible for DMTs using population‐based data in Alberta, Canada. Method We used provincial administrative health databases in Alberta, Canada (population ∼4.5 million) to identify all people newly identified with dementia between April 1, 2013 and March 31, 2022 using a validated dementia case ascertainment algorithm. The characteristics of this population were then described at the time of diagnosis including demographics, conditions potentially contributing to the diagnosis of dementia (e.g. stroke, parkinsonism), and medical contraindications to treatment (e.g. cancer, seizures). The characteristics of individuals with dementia were then compared to the inclusion criteria used in AD DMT trials to estimate the proportion of individuals with dementia who may be eligible for DMTs. We then compared the characteristics of individuals who were determined to be eligible for DMTs compared to those who were not eligible. Result A total of 77,479 individuals were identified with incident dementia during the study period with a mean age of 80.6 years and 58% were female. In this group, 15,044/77,479 (19%) had conditions other than AD as a potential cause of their dementia. Medical contraindications to DMTs were present in 24,580/62,435 (39%) of all individuals who had AD as their probable cause of dementia. Overall, 37,855/77,479 (49%) of the entire dementia population could potentially go on to receive biomarker testing to determine DMT eligibility. Individuals who were younger and women were more likely to be potentially eligible for DMTs at the time of dementia diagnosis. Conclusion Approximately half of all people diagnosed with dementia in Alberta could be eligible for DMTs based on their health history. Additional information on cognitive test scores, neuroimaging, and biomarker results are required to further refine estimates of the number of individuals potentially eligible to receive DMTs in Canada.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
University of Alberta (CA), University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Hotchkiss Brain Institute (CA), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.