Parental history of dementia does not confound the association between depression and decline in cognitive status

Abstract Background Parental history of dementia may lead to participation bias and has been largely replaced in analyses with genetic markers such as APOEe4 . We studied how the inclusion of parental history of dementia affects associations between depression and cognitive status. Method Participants without dementia were stratified by cognitive and depression status at their initial study visit (“baseline”): normal cognition without depression ( n = 7,592 ), normal cognition with depression ( n = 2,346 ), MCI without depression ( n = 2,280 ), and MCI with depression ( n = 1,525 ). Logistic regression and Fine and Gray models, with death of the participant treated as a competing event, were used to analyze whether parental history of dementia affects the association between depression and cognitive status at baseline ( n = 20,796 ) and over time. Fine and Gray models were used for participants with normal cognition at baseline and then again for NACC participants with MCI at baseline to estimate associations for the conversion to MCI or dementia respectively. Models included APOEe4 dose, participant demographics (age, sex, race, and education), in addition to self‐reported depression and depressive symptoms. Result The adjusted odds of MCI were increased for those with depression at baseline, OR = 2.51 (95% CI: 2.36‐2.68), and inclusion of parental history of dementia in the logistic regression analysis slightly strengthened the association (OR = 2.55 [2.39‐2.73]). Selection bias was evident, as participants reporting both parents with dementia had the lowest adjusted odds of cognitive impairment (OR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.57‐0.73) compared to no reported parental history. In the competing risk analysis, among those with normal cognition at baseline, those with depression had an increased risk of converting to MCI or dementia, subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) = 1.47 (95% CI: 1.31‐1.64). However, inclusion of parental history of dementia did not alter the estimates significantly in any of the Fine and Gray models. Conclusion There may be substantial heterogeneity among NACC participants with and without parental history of dementia. In our longitudinal analysis, parental history of dementia did not alter the association between depression and conversion to worse cognitive status. This suggests parental history of dementia may lead to differences in participation but may not confound longitudinal associations of interest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.090356
Primary Topic
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parental history of dementia does not confound the association between depression and decline in cognitive status

Erin L. Abner, Chad Guilliams
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
article

Parental history of dementia does not confound the association between depression and decline in cognitive status

Erin L. Abner, Chad Guilliams
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Parental history of dementia may lead to participation bias and has been largely replaced in analyses with genetic markers such as APOEe4 . We studied how the inclusion of parental history of dementia affects associations between depression and cognitive status. Method Participants without dementia were stratified by cognitive and depression status at their initial study visit (“baseline”): normal cognition without depression ( n = 7,592 ), normal cognition with depression ( n = 2,346 ), MCI without depression ( n = 2,280 ), and MCI with depression ( n = 1,525 ). Logistic regression and Fine and Gray models, with death of the participant treated as a competing event, were used to analyze whether parental history of dementia affects the association between depression and cognitive status at baseline ( n = 20,796 ) and over time. Fine and Gray models were used for participants with normal cognition at baseline and then again for NACC participants with MCI at baseline to estimate associations for the conversion to MCI or dementia respectively. Models included APOEe4 dose, participant demographics (age, sex, race, and education), in addition to self‐reported depression and depressive symptoms. Result The adjusted odds of MCI were increased for those with depression at baseline, OR = 2.51 (95% CI: 2.36‐2.68), and inclusion of parental history of dementia in the logistic regression analysis slightly strengthened the association (OR = 2.55 [2.39‐2.73]). Selection bias was evident, as participants reporting both parents with dementia had the lowest adjusted odds of cognitive impairment (OR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.57‐0.73) compared to no reported parental history. In the competing risk analysis, among those with normal cognition at baseline, those with depression had an increased risk of converting to MCI or dementia, subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) = 1.47 (95% CI: 1.31‐1.64). However, inclusion of parental history of dementia did not alter the estimates significantly in any of the Fine and Gray models. Conclusion There may be substantial heterogeneity among NACC participants with and without parental history of dementia. In our longitudinal analysis, parental history of dementia did not alter the association between depression and conversion to worse cognitive status. This suggests parental history of dementia may lead to differences in participation but may not confound longitudinal associations of interest.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
University of Kentucky (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.