Perceived adverse maternal control during childhood and striatal volume in healthy older adults: Differences between APOE ε4 carriers and non‐carriers

Abstract Background Early adversity has been reported as a risk factor for dementia. Adverse maternal control (MC) during childhood is believed to impact neural developmental pathways. Here we studied the associations between adverse MC and the volume of the dorsal striatum in older adults given evidence from the childhood adversity literature of structural reductions and altered reward processing. The contributing roles of APOE ε4 status together with multiple other known risk factors in brain aging were analysed. Method We analysed data from the MRC NSHD Insight 46 study on the Dementias Platform UK Data Portal (N = 394, 48% female, 70 years). MRI acquisition and APOE ε4 genotyping are described in published cohort papers. Bilateral volumes of the caudate nucleus and putamen were obtained using the FMRIB Software Library. MC was quantified using the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI). Using k means clustering, participants were grouped in low, medium, and high MC groups. Analyses controlled for sex, age, socioeconomic status in late adulthood and childhood, speed of pubertal growth, birthweight, BMI and MMSE score at the time of brain scanning. Result Multivariate tests were followed up with Bonferroni‐corrected comparisons. Smaller bilateral caudate nuclei and reduced wellbeing were found in the high MC group compared to the low MC group. MC effects on the brain were not mediated by wellbeing. When considering the role of APOE ε4, Roy’s largest root revealed a significant interaction between MC and APOE ε4 status. Corrected follow‐up comparisons showed that in non‐carriers only, high MC was associated with smaller left caudate, left putamen volumes as well as reduced wellbeing, compared to the low MC group. Separately, in a smaller sample of APOE ε2 carriers (N = 51), the left caudate volume was smaller in high MC group. Conclusion Our study showed that regions implicated in reward processing are smaller in individuals who experienced adverse MC during development. These effects were present in APOE ε4 non‐carriers. APOE ε4 effects are detectable in the dorsal striatum in later life in preclinical populations. Whether genotype masks stress effects on the brain in APOE ε4 carriers is yet to be established.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.087216
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceived adverse maternal control during childhood and striatal volume in healthy older adults: Differences between APOE ε4 carriers and non‐carriers

Delia A. Gheorghe, Sarah Bauermeister, Morgane Kuenzi
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Perceived adverse maternal control during childhood and striatal volume in healthy older adults: Differences between APOE ε4 carriers and non‐carriers

Delia A. Gheorghe, Sarah Bauermeister, Morgane Kuenzi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Early adversity has been reported as a risk factor for dementia. Adverse maternal control (MC) during childhood is believed to impact neural developmental pathways. Here we studied the associations between adverse MC and the volume of the dorsal striatum in older adults given evidence from the childhood adversity literature of structural reductions and altered reward processing. The contributing roles of APOE ε4 status together with multiple other known risk factors in brain aging were analysed. Method We analysed data from the MRC NSHD Insight 46 study on the Dementias Platform UK Data Portal (N = 394, 48% female, 70 years). MRI acquisition and APOE ε4 genotyping are described in published cohort papers. Bilateral volumes of the caudate nucleus and putamen were obtained using the FMRIB Software Library. MC was quantified using the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI). Using k means clustering, participants were grouped in low, medium, and high MC groups. Analyses controlled for sex, age, socioeconomic status in late adulthood and childhood, speed of pubertal growth, birthweight, BMI and MMSE score at the time of brain scanning. Result Multivariate tests were followed up with Bonferroni‐corrected comparisons. Smaller bilateral caudate nuclei and reduced wellbeing were found in the high MC group compared to the low MC group. MC effects on the brain were not mediated by wellbeing. When considering the role of APOE ε4, Roy’s largest root revealed a significant interaction between MC and APOE ε4 status. Corrected follow‐up comparisons showed that in non‐carriers only, high MC was associated with smaller left caudate, left putamen volumes as well as reduced wellbeing, compared to the low MC group. Separately, in a smaller sample of APOE ε2 carriers (N = 51), the left caudate volume was smaller in high MC group. Conclusion Our study showed that regions implicated in reward processing are smaller in individuals who experienced adverse MC during development. These effects were present in APOE ε4 non‐carriers. APOE ε4 effects are detectable in the dorsal striatum in later life in preclinical populations. Whether genotype masks stress effects on the brain in APOE ε4 carriers is yet to be established.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
University of Oxford (GB), Romanian Institute of Science and Technology (RO), Dementias Platform UK (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.