The Impact of Later‐Life Education on Trajectories of Cognitive Functionamong U.S. Older Adults

Abstract Background Little is known about how education in later life is related to cognitive function in older adults. This study assessed whether participating in later‐life education was associated with better cognitive function over time and whether the benefits differed by sex, race/ethnicity, and prior education level in a nationally‐representative sample of U.S. older adults. Method We conducted a retrospective cohort study using six waves of data from the Health and Retirement Study ([HRS] 2008‐2018) that included adults aged ≥ 65 years with no baseline diagnosis of dementia. Cognitive function was measured at baseline and over time using a summary score (range = 0‐35). Later‐life education was measured at every wave and was categorized as attended an educational or training course “at least once a month or more” (10.3%), “not in the last month” (45.5%), or “never” (44.3%). Inverse probability weighting was applied to account for potential selection bias in who participated in later‐life education. The associations between later‐life education and trajectories of cognitive function were estimated using weighted mixed‐effects linear regression models. Result Of the 12,099 participants (median [interquartile range] age, 71[67‐77]), engaging in any later‐life education, either at least once a month (0.56 points higher, 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.73; P < .001) or not in the last month (0.55 points higher, 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.65; P < .001) was associated with significantly better cognitive function over time compared to never participating in later‐life education. The association remained constant as people aged and was only partially attenuated after adjusting for sociodemographic, psychosocial, behavioral, and health‐related factors. In addition, the benefits of engaging in any later‐life education on cognitive function were greater in women than in men (at least once a month: 0.30 points higher, 95% CI, ‐0.03 to 0.63, P = .076, not in the last month: 0.24 points higher, 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.43, P = .016) but no significant differences by race/ethnicity or prior educational attainment. Conclusion Engaging in later‐life education is beneficial for cognitive function and underscores the importance of continued learning among older adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.086196
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Later‐Life Education on Trajectories of Cognitive Functionamong U.S. Older Adults

Eleanor S. McConnell, Nan Wang, Radha Dhingra, Ying Xian et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Aging and Gerontology Research
article

The Impact of Later‐Life Education on Trajectories of Cognitive Functionamong U.S. Older Adults

Eleanor S. McConnell, Nan Wang, Radha Dhingra, Ying Xian, Matthew E. Dupre, Hanzhang Xu, Bei Wu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Little is known about how education in later life is related to cognitive function in older adults. This study assessed whether participating in later‐life education was associated with better cognitive function over time and whether the benefits differed by sex, race/ethnicity, and prior education level in a nationally‐representative sample of U.S. older adults. Method We conducted a retrospective cohort study using six waves of data from the Health and Retirement Study ([HRS] 2008‐2018) that included adults aged ≥ 65 years with no baseline diagnosis of dementia. Cognitive function was measured at baseline and over time using a summary score (range = 0‐35). Later‐life education was measured at every wave and was categorized as attended an educational or training course “at least once a month or more” (10.3%), “not in the last month” (45.5%), or “never” (44.3%). Inverse probability weighting was applied to account for potential selection bias in who participated in later‐life education. The associations between later‐life education and trajectories of cognitive function were estimated using weighted mixed‐effects linear regression models. Result Of the 12,099 participants (median [interquartile range] age, 71[67‐77]), engaging in any later‐life education, either at least once a month (0.56 points higher, 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.73; P < .001) or not in the last month (0.55 points higher, 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.65; P < .001) was associated with significantly better cognitive function over time compared to never participating in later‐life education. The association remained constant as people aged and was only partially attenuated after adjusting for sociodemographic, psychosocial, behavioral, and health‐related factors. In addition, the benefits of engaging in any later‐life education on cognitive function were greater in women than in men (at least once a month: 0.30 points higher, 95% CI, ‐0.03 to 0.63, P = .076, not in the last month: 0.24 points higher, 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.43, P = .016) but no significant differences by race/ethnicity or prior educational attainment. Conclusion Engaging in later‐life education is beneficial for cognitive function and underscores the importance of continued learning among older adults.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
Duke University (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Duke-NUS Medical School (SG), Southwestern Medical Center (US), New York University (US), University of California, Davis (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Aging and Gerontology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.