Activity Diversity and Its Association with Cognitive Function at Baseline in the U.S. POINTER Study

Abstract Background Recent cross‐sectional and longitudinal studies have shown that higher activity diversity ‐ defined as richness and evenness of daily activities are beneficial to older adults’ cognitive performance. This benefit is independent of frequency or level of cognitive challenge or physical activity. Method A total of 1688 participants from the U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk with physical, mental and social activities and cognitive outcomes (global, episodic memory, executive function and processing speed composite scores) measured at the baseline were included in this analysis. The sample was characterized by a mean age of 68.4 (SD: 5.2), 66.9% female, 29.6% less than college education and 33.6% non‐white. A total of 41 activities (11 mental, 21 physical and 10 social activities) are included to evaluate total, mental, social and physical activity diversity based on Shannon’s entropy (0 as no diversity and 1 as full diversity). Walking to do errands (e.g., take children to school or to/from a store) is considered both physical and social. A sequential multiple linear regression models were used to examine associations between activity diversities and cognitive outcomes, adjusted for (model 1) age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, area deprivation index national rank (ADI), and (model 2) additionally self‐reported general health, Framingham cardiovascular disease 10‐year Risk Score, depression (Geriatric Depression Scale total score) and finally (model 3) adding cognitive activity frequency (times/week). Result Higher total activity diversity is associated with better executive function in models 1 and 2 (p <0.0344) and the association was attenuated when adding cognitive activity frequency as in model 3 (p = 0.0594). Total activity diversity is not associated with global cognition, or episodic memory or processing speed. Higher mental activity diversity is associated with higher global cognition (p<0.0001), episodic memory (p <0.0003) and executive function (p < 0.0001) in all three models, but not processing speed (p >0.2432). Conclusion These results indicate that cognitive activity diversity is associated with cognitive function in older adults at risk of cognitive decline, which is independent of other risk factors and frequency of cognitive activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.086192
Primary Topic
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Activity Diversity and Its Association with Cognitive Function at Baseline in the U.S. POINTER Study

Heather M. Snyder, Shannon Halloway, Athene KW Lee, Marjorie Howard et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
article

Activity Diversity and Its Association with Cognitive Function at Baseline in the U.S. POINTER Study

Heather M. Snyder, Shannon Halloway, Athene KW Lee, Marjorie Howard, Xiaoyan Leng, Laura D. Baker, Mark A. Espeland, Kathryn V. Papp, Sarah Tomaszewski Farias
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Recent cross‐sectional and longitudinal studies have shown that higher activity diversity ‐ defined as richness and evenness of daily activities are beneficial to older adults’ cognitive performance. This benefit is independent of frequency or level of cognitive challenge or physical activity. Method A total of 1688 participants from the U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk with physical, mental and social activities and cognitive outcomes (global, episodic memory, executive function and processing speed composite scores) measured at the baseline were included in this analysis. The sample was characterized by a mean age of 68.4 (SD: 5.2), 66.9% female, 29.6% less than college education and 33.6% non‐white. A total of 41 activities (11 mental, 21 physical and 10 social activities) are included to evaluate total, mental, social and physical activity diversity based on Shannon’s entropy (0 as no diversity and 1 as full diversity). Walking to do errands (e.g., take children to school or to/from a store) is considered both physical and social. A sequential multiple linear regression models were used to examine associations between activity diversities and cognitive outcomes, adjusted for (model 1) age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, area deprivation index national rank (ADI), and (model 2) additionally self‐reported general health, Framingham cardiovascular disease 10‐year Risk Score, depression (Geriatric Depression Scale total score) and finally (model 3) adding cognitive activity frequency (times/week). Result Higher total activity diversity is associated with better executive function in models 1 and 2 (p <0.0344) and the association was attenuated when adding cognitive activity frequency as in model 3 (p = 0.0594). Total activity diversity is not associated with global cognition, or episodic memory or processing speed. Higher mental activity diversity is associated with higher global cognition (p<0.0001), episodic memory (p <0.0003) and executive function (p < 0.0001) in all three models, but not processing speed (p >0.2432). Conclusion These results indicate that cognitive activity diversity is associated with cognitive function in older adults at risk of cognitive decline, which is independent of other risk factors and frequency of cognitive activities.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S7)
Alzheimer's Association (US), Harvard University (US), Providence College (US), Brown University (US), Butler Hospital (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Wake Forest University (US), Rush University (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.