Exploring barriers and facilitators for the implementation of Alzheimer’s disease blood‐based biomarkers in primary care: The CANTATE‐Perspectives study

Abstract Background Adequately diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in primary care can be challenging. Early symptoms often go unrecognized and other (neurodegenerative) diseases may be misdiagnosed as AD. AD blood‐based biomarkers could improve the diagnostic process for cognitive complaints in primary care. To prepare for implementation of these biomarkers in different contexts, we investigated barriers and facilitators from the perspective of general practitioners (GPs). Method In this qualitative, semi‐structured interview study, we used purposive sampling to select a heterogeneous group of 18 Dutch GPs (Figure I & Table I). The interview guide was based on the “Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Interviews were audio‐recorded and transcripts analyzed using MaxQDA software. By means of directed content analysis, a multidisciplinary research team (TC, FV & LV) identified barriers and facilitators for implementation of AD blood‐based biomarkers in primary care and categorized these into TDF‐domains. Result We identified 8 relevant TDF‐domains (Table II). Barriers could be mapped on the environmental context and resources (e.g. AD blood‐based biomarkers not being in GP guidelines) and knowledge domains (e.g. GPs perceived AD‐dementia as a syndromic diagnosis, not a biological diagnosis and were unaware of AD blood‐based biomarkers). Other important domains were emotion and beliefs about consequences (e.g. AD blood‐based biomarkers could result in over‐ or underdiagnosis of AD). Facilitators could be mapped onto the environmental context and resources domain (e.g. availability of (disease‐modifying) treatment for AD, availability of education and accessible information for GPs and patients). Furthermore, facilitators could be mapped onto the social influences, beliefs about consequences & memory, attention and decision processes domains (e.g. GPs believed that AD blood‐based biomarkers would be useful in primary care as biomarkers could initiate further care, facilitate decision‐making and provide clarity regarding the diagnosis). Conclusion We identified a large variety of barriers and facilitators that can help to further understand and enable the implementation of AD blood‐based biomarkers in primary care. Important barriers and facilitators include the need for education and accessible information to enhance GPs’ knowledge about AD blood‐based biomarkers. Our next step is to further explore and confirm relevant factors for successful implementation by means of focus groups and a large scale questionnaire.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.088783
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring barriers and facilitators for the implementation of Alzheimer’s disease blood‐based biomarkers in primary care: The CANTATE‐Perspectives study

Argonde C. van Harten, Leonie N.C. Visser, Barbara C. Van Munster, Wiesje M. van der Flier et al.
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Ethics in Clinical Research
0.54
article

Exploring barriers and facilitators for the implementation of Alzheimer’s disease blood‐based biomarkers in primary care: The CANTATE‐Perspectives study

Argonde C. van Harten, Leonie N.C. Visser, Barbara C. Van Munster, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Thomas Claessen, Charlotte Elisabeth Teunissen, F. C. Visser, Martí Jiménez‐Mausbach
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Adequately diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in primary care can be challenging. Early symptoms often go unrecognized and other (neurodegenerative) diseases may be misdiagnosed as AD. AD blood‐based biomarkers could improve the diagnostic process for cognitive complaints in primary care. To prepare for implementation of these biomarkers in different contexts, we investigated barriers and facilitators from the perspective of general practitioners (GPs). Method In this qualitative, semi‐structured interview study, we used purposive sampling to select a heterogeneous group of 18 Dutch GPs (Figure I & Table I). The interview guide was based on the “Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Interviews were audio‐recorded and transcripts analyzed using MaxQDA software. By means of directed content analysis, a multidisciplinary research team (TC, FV & LV) identified barriers and facilitators for implementation of AD blood‐based biomarkers in primary care and categorized these into TDF‐domains. Result We identified 8 relevant TDF‐domains (Table II). Barriers could be mapped on the environmental context and resources (e.g. AD blood‐based biomarkers not being in GP guidelines) and knowledge domains (e.g. GPs perceived AD‐dementia as a syndromic diagnosis, not a biological diagnosis and were unaware of AD blood‐based biomarkers). Other important domains were emotion and beliefs about consequences (e.g. AD blood‐based biomarkers could result in over‐ or underdiagnosis of AD). Facilitators could be mapped onto the environmental context and resources domain (e.g. availability of (disease‐modifying) treatment for AD, availability of education and accessible information for GPs and patients). Furthermore, facilitators could be mapped onto the social influences, beliefs about consequences & memory, attention and decision processes domains (e.g. GPs believed that AD blood‐based biomarkers would be useful in primary care as biomarkers could initiate further care, facilitate decision‐making and provide clarity regarding the diagnosis). Conclusion We identified a large variety of barriers and facilitators that can help to further understand and enable the implementation of AD blood‐based biomarkers in primary care. Important barriers and facilitators include the need for education and accessible information to enhance GPs’ knowledge about AD blood‐based biomarkers. Our next step is to further explore and confirm relevant factors for successful implementation by means of focus groups and a large scale questionnaire.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL), Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Dialyse Centrum Groningen (NL), GGD Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Ethics in Clinical Research
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.