The lexical boost effect is stronger in main clauses than in subordinate clauses

Structural priming effects are stronger if there is lexical overlap between prime and target, the so-called lexical boost effect to structural priming. While abstract structural priming is long-lasting and seems to reflect implicit learning, the lexical boost effect decays quickly and might be induced by residual activation or explicit memory. A recent study only found a lexical boost effect in ditransitive structures in subordinate clauses when the head verb in the subordinate clause rather than the matrix head verb was repeated between prime and target. We report an experiment in which the lexical boost effect is weaker in subordinate clauses than in main clauses when repeating the head verb. Our findings suggest that the lexical boost effect caused by repeating head verbs can be disrupted due to an increased amount of interfering material.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Language Sciences
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/flang.2024.1462269
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The lexical boost effect is stronger in main clauses than in subordinate clauses

Rianne van Lieburg, Sarah Bernolet
Frontiers in Language Sciences
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

The lexical boost effect is stronger in main clauses than in subordinate clauses

Rianne van Lieburg, Sarah Bernolet
article en

Abstract

Structural priming effects are stronger if there is lexical overlap between prime and target, the so-called lexical boost effect to structural priming. While abstract structural priming is long-lasting and seems to reflect implicit learning, the lexical boost effect decays quickly and might be induced by residual activation or explicit memory. A recent study only found a lexical boost effect in ditransitive structures in subordinate clauses when the head verb in the subordinate clause rather than the matrix head verb was repeated between prime and target. We report an experiment in which the lexical boost effect is weaker in subordinate clauses than in main clauses when repeating the head verb. Our findings suggest that the lexical boost effect caused by repeating head verbs can be disrupted due to an increased amount of interfering material.

Frontiers in Language SciencesVol. 3
University of Antwerp (BE), Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (NL)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaamse regering
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The lexical boost effect is stronger in main clauses than in subordinate clauses — Rianne van Lieburg, Sarah Bernolet · Frontiers in Language Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS