Chemical sensing vs. Gas chromatography: Metrological characterization of two methods for hydrogen quantification in energy gas blends

Hydrogen is currently favoured as a replacement for natural gas in the decarbonisation of gas grids. In addition to pure hydrogen grids, blending with natural gas is also being discussed, but this is limited by infrastructure requirements. In any case, high-precision on-line analysis is required to measure the hydrogen amount for quality control and to ensure energy metering for billing purposes. The industry is therefore looking for suitable analysis methods. One way is to upgrade proven process gas chromatographs, another is to use new dedicated sensors. As part of the EMPIR-Decarb project, a first comparison of the accuracy of these systems was carried out using traceable calibration gases with small uncertainties. Two commercially available measurement systems show that comparable measurement uncertainties of about 0.5 % (k = 2) can be achieved in the range between 30 % and 100 % of hydrogen. In the case of the process gas chromatograph, linear behaviour can even be observed down to a hydrogen concentration of 1 %.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement Sensors
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2024.101720
Primary Topic
Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chemical sensing vs. Gas chromatography: Metrological characterization of two methods for hydrogen quantification in energy gas blends

Gundolf Weseloh, Bert Anders
Measurement Sensors
Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
article

Chemical sensing vs. Gas chromatography: Metrological characterization of two methods for hydrogen quantification in energy gas blends

Gundolf Weseloh, Bert Anders
article en

Abstract

Hydrogen is currently favoured as a replacement for natural gas in the decarbonisation of gas grids. In addition to pure hydrogen grids, blending with natural gas is also being discussed, but this is limited by infrastructure requirements. In any case, high-precision on-line analysis is required to measure the hydrogen amount for quality control and to ensure energy metering for billing purposes. The industry is therefore looking for suitable analysis methods. One way is to upgrade proven process gas chromatographs, another is to use new dedicated sensors. As part of the EMPIR-Decarb project, a first comparison of the accuracy of these systems was carried out using traceable calibration gases with small uncertainties. Two commercially available measurement systems show that comparable measurement uncertainties of about 0.5 % (k = 2) can be achieved in the range between 30 % and 100 % of hydrogen. In the case of the process gas chromatograph, linear behaviour can even be observed down to a hydrogen concentration of 1 %.

Measurement SensorsVol. 38
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Chemical sensing vs. Gas chromatography: Metrological characterization of two methods for hydrogen quantification in energy gas blends — Gundolf Weseloh, Bert Anders · Measurement Sensors (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS