Examining the feasibility of cognitive bias modification for patients with cancer and survivors in 3 independent pilot studies

Abstract Objective: Cancer comes with considerable psychological and emotional distress, which can persist long after initial treatment. Yet, few digital interventions targeting emotional distress are available for patients with cancer and survivors. Cognitive bias modification (CBM) is a digital intervention designed to reduce emotional distress by repeatedly training automatic processing of positive and disease-specific information. We examined the feasibility, safety, and clinical potential of CBM as secondary prevention of psychiatric disorders. Methods: Three independent pilot studies were conducted in samples with emotional distress: (i) patients newly diagnosed with hematological cancer at the start of their treatment, (ii) patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy, and (iii) cancer survivors ≥5 years after curative treatment receiving long-term survivorship care. Within each study, patients were randomized to either receive four sessions of computer-based active or control CBM or a nonintervention condition. Self-report measures of emotional distress were administered before, directly after, and one week after the intervention. Intervention feasibility and safety were assessed, as well as the direction of symptom change. Results: The intervention was deemed unfeasible in patients newly diagnosed with cancer and patients receiving chemotherapy. In cancer survivors, however, the intervention was well tolerated and possibly clinically relevant. The intervention was considered safe for all three populations. Conclusions: CBM can be considered as a possible secondary prevention digital intervention for cancer survivors. The intervention seems inappropriate for patients with cancer receiving treatment, possibly because the treatment phase itself is too impactful. Future research could examine the preventative potential of CBM in a clinical trial in cancer survivors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Research and Practice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/or9.0000000000000153
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.56

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the feasibility of cognitive bias modification for patients with cancer and survivors in 3 independent pilot studies

Jacqueline J. Loonen, Judith B. Prins, Edwin J. Schenkel, José A. E. Custers et al.
3 citations
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Research and Practice
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
4.56
article

Examining the feasibility of cognitive bias modification for patients with cancer and survivors in 3 independent pilot studies

Jacqueline J. Loonen, Judith B. Prins, Edwin J. Schenkel, José A. E. Custers, Agnès J. van de Wouw, Indira Tendolkar, Nicole M. A. Blijlevens, Janna N. Vrijsen, Joyce Wilbers, Demi D. Tenschert, Patrick Eichelsheim, Valerie Delbressine
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Cancer comes with considerable psychological and emotional distress, which can persist long after initial treatment. Yet, few digital interventions targeting emotional distress are available for patients with cancer and survivors. Cognitive bias modification (CBM) is a digital intervention designed to reduce emotional distress by repeatedly training automatic processing of positive and disease-specific information. We examined the feasibility, safety, and clinical potential of CBM as secondary prevention of psychiatric disorders. Methods: Three independent pilot studies were conducted in samples with emotional distress: (i) patients newly diagnosed with hematological cancer at the start of their treatment, (ii) patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy, and (iii) cancer survivors ≥5 years after curative treatment receiving long-term survivorship care. Within each study, patients were randomized to either receive four sessions of computer-based active or control CBM or a nonintervention condition. Self-report measures of emotional distress were administered before, directly after, and one week after the intervention. Intervention feasibility and safety were assessed, as well as the direction of symptom change. Results: The intervention was deemed unfeasible in patients newly diagnosed with cancer and patients receiving chemotherapy. In cancer survivors, however, the intervention was well tolerated and possibly clinically relevant. The intervention was considered safe for all three populations. Conclusions: CBM can be considered as a possible secondary prevention digital intervention for cancer survivors. The intervention seems inappropriate for patients with cancer receiving treatment, possibly because the treatment phase itself is too impactful. Future research could examine the preventative potential of CBM in a clinical trial in cancer survivors.

Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Research and PracticeVol. 7(1)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), VieCuri Medisch Centrum (NL), Pro Persona (NL)
Interreg
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
4.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.