A Reproducible Method for Donor Site Computed Tomography Measurements in Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction

We present an approach for evaluating abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans that generates reproducible measures relevant to donor site morbidity after abdominally based breast reconstruction. Seventeen preoperative CT metrics were measured in 20 patients with software: interanterior superior iliac spine distance; abdominal wall protrusion; interrectus distance; rectus abdominis width, thickness, and width-to-thickness ratio; abdominal wall thickness; subcutaneous fat volume; visceral fat volume; right/left psoas volumes and densities; and right/left rectus abdominis volumes and densities. Two operators performed measures to determine interrater reliability (n = 10). Interclass coefficients (ICCs) were calculated, and Bland-Altman plots were fashioned. Intrarater reliability was excellent (ICC > 0.9, 0.958-1) for 15 measures, and good (0.75 < ICC < 0.9, 0.815-0.853) for 2 measures. Interrater reliability was excellent (ICC > 0.9, 0.912-0.995) for 12 measures and good (0.75 < ICC < 0.9, 0.78-0.896) for 5 measures. Bland-Altman plots confirmed intra/interrater agreement. Our study meets its objective of establishing a protocol for obtaining abdominal CT measurements with high reproducibility and intrarater and interrater reliability. Although this study is not meant to weigh the particular influences of various CT measurements on clinical outcomes, we are now actively studying this with the intention of reporting our findings in the near future. Larger patient cohorts must be leveraged to determine correlations between abdominal CT scan findings and donor site outcomes using machine learning algorithms that generate models for predicting abdominal donor site complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000006413
Primary Topic
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Reproducible Method for Donor Site Computed Tomography Measurements in Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Gary B. Skolnick, Terence M. Myckatyn, Austin Y. Ha, Arthur C. Sletten et al.
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
article

A Reproducible Method for Donor Site Computed Tomography Measurements in Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Gary B. Skolnick, Terence M. Myckatyn, Austin Y. Ha, Arthur C. Sletten, Paul K. Commean, Damini Tandon
article en

Abstract

We present an approach for evaluating abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans that generates reproducible measures relevant to donor site morbidity after abdominally based breast reconstruction. Seventeen preoperative CT metrics were measured in 20 patients with software: interanterior superior iliac spine distance; abdominal wall protrusion; interrectus distance; rectus abdominis width, thickness, and width-to-thickness ratio; abdominal wall thickness; subcutaneous fat volume; visceral fat volume; right/left psoas volumes and densities; and right/left rectus abdominis volumes and densities. Two operators performed measures to determine interrater reliability (n = 10). Interclass coefficients (ICCs) were calculated, and Bland-Altman plots were fashioned. Intrarater reliability was excellent (ICC > 0.9, 0.958-1) for 15 measures, and good (0.75 < ICC < 0.9, 0.815-0.853) for 2 measures. Interrater reliability was excellent (ICC > 0.9, 0.912-0.995) for 12 measures and good (0.75 < ICC < 0.9, 0.78-0.896) for 5 measures. Bland-Altman plots confirmed intra/interrater agreement. Our study meets its objective of establishing a protocol for obtaining abdominal CT measurements with high reproducibility and intrarater and interrater reliability. Although this study is not meant to weigh the particular influences of various CT measurements on clinical outcomes, we are now actively studying this with the intention of reporting our findings in the near future. Larger patient cohorts must be leveraged to determine correlations between abdominal CT scan findings and donor site outcomes using machine learning algorithms that generate models for predicting abdominal donor site complications.

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenVol. 13(1)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.