A left-to-right bias in number-space mapping across ages and cultures

Number and space are inherently related. Previous research has provided evidence that numbers are aligned to a so-called "mental number line", which is malleable and affected by cultural factors mostly linked to literacy-related habits. However, preverbal humans and non-human animals also map numerosities into space, in a consistent left-to-right direction. These contrasting findings raise the question of whether Spatial Numerical Associations (SNA) are culturally or biologically determined. Here, we investigated Italian adults, Italian preschoolers, and Himba adults (an indigenous population with an oral cultural system) to examine whether cultural influences are necessary for SNA to emerge. We found that, when explicitly asked to order numerosities, only Italian adults showed a consistent left-to-right preference, while preschoolers and Himba adults did not have a consistent preference for one direction or the other. On the other hand, in a numerosity comparison task, all groups performed better when small numerosities were presented in the left hemispace. These results suggest that humans may display two forms of SNAs, one that emerges mostly in implicit tasks and is biologically determined, and one that emerges in explicit ordering tasks and is determined by cultural habits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-01-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55685-x
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A left-to-right bias in number-space mapping across ages and cultures

Mathilde Josserand, Manuela Piazza, M. Buiatti, Serge Caparos et al.
8 citations
Nature Communications
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
21.04
article

A left-to-right bias in number-space mapping across ages and cultures

Mathilde Josserand, Manuela Piazza, M. Buiatti, Serge Caparos, Esther Boissin, Giorgio Vallortígara, Elena Eccher
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Number and space are inherently related. Previous research has provided evidence that numbers are aligned to a so-called "mental number line", which is malleable and affected by cultural factors mostly linked to literacy-related habits. However, preverbal humans and non-human animals also map numerosities into space, in a consistent left-to-right direction. These contrasting findings raise the question of whether Spatial Numerical Associations (SNA) are culturally or biologically determined. Here, we investigated Italian adults, Italian preschoolers, and Himba adults (an indigenous population with an oral cultural system) to examine whether cultural influences are necessary for SNA to emerge. We found that, when explicitly asked to order numerosities, only Italian adults showed a consistent left-to-right preference, while preschoolers and Himba adults did not have a consistent preference for one direction or the other. On the other hand, in a numerosity comparison task, all groups performed better when small numerosities were presented in the left hemispace. These results suggest that humans may display two forms of SNAs, one that emerges mostly in implicit tasks and is biologically determined, and one that emerges in explicit ordering tasks and is determined by cultural habits.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut Universitaire de France (FR), University of Trento (IT), Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems (IT), Éco-Anthropologie (FR), Université Paris 8 (FR)
European Commission, Institut Universitaire de France
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
21.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.